this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
135 points (100.0% liked)

news

24374 readers
718 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

At a glance, given ~10 minutes scratching at the surface, I don't see anything awry about the citation, the primary author, or the methodology. It's usually enough for me to go "oh, they're being foolish." All I could say is that I wouldn't base policy on research that came out a month ago until the author's peers get a chance to sink their teeth into it.

The biggest problem is that the study is based on a small scale meta data analysis, which has a really hard time establishing causation vs correlation. The second biggest problem is the person who did the study is an expert witness in a lawsuit against Johnson and johnson over the very same topic and has already had previous testimony excluded from the trial.

Definitely needs a peer review and further research to establish anything close to causation. At this point it could just be that women in the third trimester who experience prolonged or bad fevers have a greater chance at giving birth to someone with autism. Or it could be that women who have better access to neonatal and gynecological care good enough to collect umbilical samples, also have enough resources to have their children diagnosed for autism later in life.