Main, home of the dope ass bear.
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
They ultimately always do though, just with more or less extra steps.
You make a good point, and that is a problem that's ultimately very difficult to get around. It's hard to figure out how to protect the judiciary from retaliation such that people who aren't guilty will be found not guilty on the evidence and facts and the judge won't be afraid of retaliation for ruling against the prosecution, without giving them ultimate power and creating stupid loopholes. But ultimately I think we may have a clash of principles here, where most communists tend to prefer that the guilty be caught and punished even at the expense of the innocent, while I believe it's better to let a few possibly guilty folks go free, than lock up or execute one innocent person. (Also, I think show trials are stupid and the government ought to be humiliated if they hold a massive spectacle of punishing someone for an egregious crime but the evidence doesn't hold up. And that person can't be acquitted on the facts if the judge is afraid of reprisals.)