this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
92 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
671 readers
543 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ah, gotcha. Still not a Nazi ideology, if I'm reading correctly it seems to generally be for a strong Korean identity as a means to achieve national liberation from colonialism in service of a grander internationalist project. The US Empire's occupation being whitewashed as "progressive" is similar to rainbow imperialism, using progressive social views to safeguard deeply reactionary imperialism. That would coincide with the strong anti-imperialist solidarity across ethnic lines the DPRK has pushed since its inception. That being said, it certainly looks bad, for sure.
That all being said, I'm far from an expert on the DPRK and still need to do a deep dive on it once my reading lightens up.
Yeah with just this surface reading with zero background for me it reads to me as classic '40s Soviet agitprop with an adjustment accounting for the fact the DPRK isn't a federal multi-national state.
I agree. I'd like to see more context than just this snippet, especially from the same author, to see more on this, but at a surface-level it doesn't talk anything about Korean superiority, while directly addressing US occupation.