this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
554 points (88.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34891 readers
1110 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They shouldn't be able to do that!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yes, we all want some censorship.

Speak for yourself.

defederation is censorship.

instance bans are censorship.

community bans are censorship.\

And I disagree with them.

is your position that none of those should be allowed?

My position is that it should all be up to the user. Let me block instances and communities if I don't want to see them. Let me choose what content I want to see. I don't need some mods deciding what is and isn't acceptable based on their ideologies and beliefs, because as we all know and see every day, most abuse that power almost all the time.

if so, thats a wild position to take, but you should say it with your full chest at least.

It's not wild at all, and I have never tried to hide it. I've said it openly many, many times on Lemmy. I think all censorship is bad. Only weak minded people want or need censorship.

Nice attempted "gotcha" though.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But that's the right off the mod and the admin to express themselves through blocking and defederation. It sounds like you're supporting compelled speech

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It sounds like you’re supporting compelled speech

How on earth do you come to that conclusion? Do you even know what "compelled speech" is? What is it?

I know you don't know btw, but I will have a good laugh at you trying to explain it.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You seem to be against letting people control who says what on their own servers.
It's not a stretch to imagine you want that enshrined in law.
Forcing someone to keep content available on their own servers by law is forced speech, because refusing to serve content from their own servers is a form of speech (assuming you're American, because, yanno) (in this case, the forced speech was deemed legal, but still forced speech).

You're saying you're not just for the freedom of speech (government cannot silence you) you're anti-censorship (nobody can silence you), which means nothing without the ability to protect it.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So me wanting free speech means that I want compelled speech, in your mind?

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Lol so forcing other people to serve your content is free speech, in your mind?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If you're censoring someone then you don't want free speech. If you're hosting a platform for discussion and you start banning people and deleting posts etc, you're being authoritarian and you are demonstrating that you don't think free speech should be allowed.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If a private citizen removing your content from their own privately owned server is interfering with your right to free speech, then forcing a private citizen to serve your content from their privately owned server is forced speech, by the same arguments.
Which makes you an authoritarian demonstrating that you think forced speech should be allowed.
Simple as.

You're allowed to say it, but I'm not forced to repeat it on your behalf using my servers. You can say it using your own servers, or the servers of someone who agrees with you.

The right to not say something is an aspect of free speech that you don't seem to support.