Charlie Kirk has never received a warm welcome in the pages of this magazine. It doesn’t matter now. The assassination of Kirk is a tragedy. Morally, it is unjustifiable. Politically, it is cause for serious alarm. A larger spiral into political violence would be a catastrophe for the Left.
As of the time of this writing, no one knows the shooter’s ideology or motivations. But some key points are clear enough.
No one should be killed as punishment for political expression, no matter how objectionable. In addition to our basic abhorrence of violence, we are also proponents of democracy, which depends on free speech and open inquiry. Without them, collective self-governance is impossible and tyranny becomes inevitable. Imposing silence on political opponents by brute force, whether in the form of state crackdowns on dissent or lone-wolf assassinations of leaders, undermines a principle that democratic socialists have always held dear.
Just goes to highlight the line the author has for what counts as political expression. To them calling for the deaths of trans/brown/immigrants/ etc people is political expression. Not good for killing. I assume at some point the author tho would make an exception. If Kirk called specifically for the authors death (on the basis of some political belief) would that merely be political expression ? Or would've that crossed a line where Kirk could be punished?
Classic well he wasn't mean to me so obviously it was fine.