this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8544 readers
417 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reading for an exam and the author just states:

the structuralist thinking of Marx and Durkheim, for example, operates within a largely positivistic framework.

Seriously, the more of these mainstream academia books I read the more I feel like none of these people have actually spent any real time reading Marx or trying to understand marxist theory.

On positivism and Marxism from my other self-appointed readings

No point to this post really, I just feel increasingly disillusioned about my ability to ever write a Marxist dissertation in Western academia, one that would actually pass. There aren't even anyone to teach me or guide me in it in my field, the most Marxist guy I've found is firmly a Frankfurt school type.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] grym@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Real.

Honestly I feel like most of my time studying and reading Marxist stuff these past 5-6 years has been about eventually realising 99% of the modern western literature and "schools" and thinkers are useless and wrong. And that NOBODY FUCKING READS MARX AND ENGELS.

Like please give me back the time I wasted reading Debord. PLEASE.

[โ€“] StillNoLeftLeft@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

And those few that claim they did only talk about alienation and yet typically don't really seem to understand what Marx meant by it.

I particularly hate how they try to paint many, clearly not at all Marxist, writers like Bourdieu or the critical realist guy Bashkar as somehow Marxist.