this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
326 points (98.5% liked)

News

32107 readers
5401 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The woman thought to have the most direct knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's decades-long sex-trafficking operation claims there was no client list, no blackmail scheme and -- to her knowledge -- no high-profile Epstein associates who committed illicit acts in connection with the notorious sex-offender's crimes.

That's according to an account provided by Epstein's convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell to a top official of the U.S. Department of Justice during a highly unusual two-day interview session last month, according to a transcript and audio of the conversation released Friday by the DOJ.

After her interviews with the DoJ, Maxwell was moved to a Club Fed prison where all inmates are eligible for work release during their detention. The fact that she gave no incriminating evidence about Epstein associates, when it is plainly obvious to everyone that she has such evidence, shows that she was not rewarded for cooperating with the investigation, but for obstructing it.

Archive link: https://archive.is/yJTnv

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is your reading comprehension that bad? They clearly stated that the Dems were doing something, to the point where Mike Johnson ended the session early because of it.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the Dems were doing something, to the point where Mike Johnson ended the session early because of it.

Yeah, and? You're seriously trying to argue that the culmination of all their effort over five years after this woman was arrested is that a single House session ended a few days early? What the kind of nonsense is that?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They haven't done anything about it at any point in the last five years, but "this time it's different" and when do they plan on doing something? "soon"

Was that not you?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yep that's me, and that's also me telling you that their efforts culminating in what amounts to a few extra vacation days for themselves isn't "doing something." What's so hard to understand about that? Why are you making excuses for a bunch of people protecting pedophiles from justice?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's so hard to understand about the fact that they were doing so much that the opposition party had to shut down Congress to stop them?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That the result of their "doing so much" was a few extra days off of work for themselves. Would you call that a victory?

If your sister/cousin/daughter were molested by one of these individuals would that feel like justice served after half a decade of them sitting on this information? I think not.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do you actually think their goal was extra days off? You can't be that stupid.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Who cares what their goals were. We're talking about what they've actually accomplished and thus far that's only been extra days off.

The fact that this all you can point to before resorting to insults says quite a lot about the quality of your argument.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right, because after the session was closed it was literally impossible for them to accomplish anything else.

You're baselessly assuming that they'll drop it when Congress resumes.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

And here is where we circle back to the fact that this is the sum of their accomplishments six years after Epstein's arrest and five years after Maxwell's. Make your excuses about how "they would do something, but they can't do anything now because blah blah blah" but it's falling on deaf ears.

Why don't you take a step back and examine what you're even defending here.