495
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bobman@unilem.org to c/world@lemmy.world

Edit: Surprised at all the vegans in this thread. I didn't think there were so many of you. I'm glad you care so much about animal rights, that you're willing to forego eating them and using products made from them. If you're not vegan and have moral objections for this, maybe you should look at yourself first and all the animal abuse you sanction by eating animals and using animal products. Did you know dairy cows have to be pregnant to produce milk? They're artificially inseminated throughout most of their lives. I hope everyone complaining about this also complains about ice cream and cheese. Or else they would be hypocrites who just want to blame others but never look at themselves.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] citrusface@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I think you are proving OP right.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

If OP is an ethical vegan, then they have a point. Everyone else needs to get over themselves.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No vegan has a point if they're opposed to growing new human organs.

Human lives are more valuable than any animal's life.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That's a judgement call. I mean, I agree, but it's not objectively true.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Sure, but that's my opinion, and thankfully the opinion of the overwhelming majority of people.

Veganism is stupid

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Eh.. why do you care enough to have an opinion about them? Do you know a lot of pushy vegans? If yes, the problem isn't veganism, it's pushy jerks.

Veganism is fine because I'm not vegan so I don't care.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

There are vegans in this thread arguing against this life-saving procedure because it uses animals.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So they have a low value of human life. It's a weird point of view, but it's not objectively wrong.

In their defense, have you met people? Are you sure that people are better than pigs?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Sh3Rm4n@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

And why is that? Why attach value which can be compared to living species? I dislike such kind of ethical system. This is a flawed absolutist argument.

I like that commenters keep saying animals as if that blanket term doesn't include humans. Anyone who thinks people aren't animals is not worth arguing with.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
495 points (96.1% liked)

World News

38965 readers
2143 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS