this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
115 points (98.3% liked)

news

24348 readers
657 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some find it brutal. But if done the right way, for the right people, it can work.

Whoever wrote this byline should be shot.

It’s trying to change policy really around three different issues. First, it’s trying to expand the use of civil commitments; that’s involuntary mental health treatment. It’s usually reserved for people who are a danger to themselves, danger to others, or unable to meet their basic needs. And he’s looking to expand that. It’s not totally clear how he’s gonna do that, because that’s determined by state law, but in any case, that’s one of his objectives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 69 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Just put people without homes in homes it is literally that fucking simple. Homelessness is one of the things that libs love overcomplicating more than nearly any other societal issue

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 39 points 3 weeks ago

Have you considered this though? us-foreign-policy

[–] moss_icon@hexbear.net 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In the UK, there are literally more vacant houses than homeless people.

Landlords can jump off a cliff.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

that's broadly true in the US too but much of the housing stock is in rural and suburban areas that just compound poverty (requiring cars/there's no work) so the lack of housing is still acute in cities

[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't see why we have to stop at housing why not provide food and healthcare too

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

of course, there's just a misunderstanding that we could seize all the vacancies in a city or wherever and actually house the local houseless, which is not necessarily true despite the national statistics

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Naturally, the real solution is to build more luxury apartments and parking lots for the prospective tenants.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

5% of the units will be "low income" for 4 years after construction. If you criticize this development plan in any way you're pro-homelessness, btw

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck, have you been spying on me? How did you perfectly quote my city council??

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah but if that person gets a home then why did I have to pay for MY home??? Checkmate liberal.

We're also going to defund St. Judes Children Hospital since those kids don't pay for their healthcare either. I'm tired of handouts.

Point out that the root cause of the housing crisis is the commodification of housing and watch their heads spin. The solution is so simple but some parasite can't profit off of human needs, so it'll never happen.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They do love overcomplicating it. I've heard so many wild and usually contradictory assertions and all from the same lib lol. Ex "they don't even want to live in homes", and "they live in homes, they just go out and beg because they don't want to work."

[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

It's like the, "they don't want to go to shelters because they have to be sober" line from people who have never witnessed how fucked up shelters can be.