this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
581 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

216 readers
257 users here now

Memes! A way of describing cultural information being shared. An element of a culture or system of behavior that may be considered to be passed from one individual to another by nongenetic means, especially imitation.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Economics, as an intellectual discipline, is far closer to theology than physics.

Asking an economist for advice is akin to asking a priest.

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

Yep!

Economics is a valid area of study, after all everyone loves money and needs some. Things work better for everyone when it is moving around optimally.

But money also buys opinions from feckless nerds. Thus the entire ‘science’ of economics as the public sees it is much more akin to a company paying a consultant to come in to deliver bad news about needed layoffs. It is pure theatre to deflect ire away from the real reasons.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Can confirm.

But DAMN, will they make the case that we're correct AF while hedging and saying "well, it depends..." half the time.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Depends on who you ask. There are economists who actually go through all the data and are the ones who can provide sources and examples and there are the ones who go “trust me bro the companies love and care about you and totally listen to your opinions bro please the free market will protect you and you totally have power pleeeeeeease bro”.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is this any different to the various incarnations of priests? Economists interpret budgets as if they’re dregs of tea leaves, and unemployment statistics like the entrails of a sacrificial animal.

It doesn’t matter how rigorously someone analyses scripture, the end result can only ever intersect with reality by accident.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, scientists do that too, as a geologist, the hardest of hard sciences pun very much intended

We look at crystals like the dregs of tea leaves and isotope ratios like they're the entrails of a sacrificed animal.

As a common heard saying on mines, 3 geologists will have 4 opinions

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference is that economics is a social science, masquerading as a hard science. Nothing wrong with the social sciences but they often present themselves as though the results they've found are akin to a hard science experiment with the lowest R values on record. In fact, ironically, most economists tend to look down their noses at the other social sciences and I think it's causing them a lot of dukkha.

Ironically, it's the social sciences that would help them realise that their discipline was already enough, as it was, all along.

The real problem came when neoclassical economics was rebranded as "just basic economics!" and not one of many conflicting, equally supported, schools of thought.

[–] gaybriel_fr_br@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My study presented economics as a soft science, so I'm not sure where you're coming from.

Of course it's a social science, but even those use experiments and the scientific method, or do you also think sociology and psychology are bullshit?

STEM people are the ones always looking down on every other discipline, you're the case in point.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When did I say that any of them were bullshit? Can you not make up things i didn't say and then argue against that instead please?

I literally said that the subject was already good enough, as it was. How did you miss that?

[–] gaybriel_fr_br@jlai.lu 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference is that economics is a social science, masquerading as a hard science. Nothing wrong with the social sciences but they often present themselves as though the results they’ve found are akin to a hard science experiment with the lowest R values on record. In fact, ironically, most economists tend to look down their noses at the other social sciences and I think it’s causing them a lot of dukkha.

This entire paragraph was really telling.

Okay, so, I'll try again, which bit is the part where I said the subject was bullshit? From the looks of it, it does seem as though you just made it up and argued against that, instead of what I said.

Interesting that you left out the part where I said it was always good enough all along thought. Then again, I guess that part does really shit all over the nonses you're spewing doesn't it?

At this point I'm concerned that you genuinely can't tell the difference between the words I used and "all economics is bullshit."

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

there are the ones who go “trust me bro the companies love and care about you and totally listen to your opinions bro please the free market will protect you and you totally have power pleeeeeeease bro”.

Those people are influencers, not economists.