this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
105 points (99.1% liked)
emoji
1373 readers
5 users here now
A workshop for the memes of production.
Submit new emoji here.
A good submission is:
- Visually clear at a small size (120 pixel width) [This does not mean upload the small image, this means upload the source image or full size cutout but test prior.]
- Have a transparent background to the greatest degree possible. This online tool can remove many backgrounds.
- Display a clear emotion or purpose
- If including text, should be properly sized to be readable
- "Evergreen" and not something that will be irrelevant after the next news cycle
- Formatted in PNG, GIF, or SVG to make our file optimization cycles easier. If svg initially, send svg in a seperately hosted link to WhyEssEff. Same with gif, as we render them as mp4 IIRC.
- Have proposed title as the title of the post, nothing more, nothing less.
- Post body should include a suggested category and keywords.
- Max height of 3 times the width.
Rules:
- No reactionary or reactionary-adjacent expressions. The purpose of an image is what it expresses. Some clear examples for this rule:
- Allowed: Broken fasces, burning stars-and-bars, rotated Mussolini
- Disallowed: Body-shaming, Pepes, gay-shaming the enemy (e.g. those pictures of Putin and Trump that libs love to post), certain hateful wojaks (even if recontextualized)
- If you think you have touched on a grey area, see rule 7 for how to litigate this.
- ~~Nothing Vaush-related is allowed~~
- To be honest, I broke this rule, so it's pretty much moot. Just run it by me first in DMs or matrix. Vaush is a bit of a dead horse, so to speak, so they're still generally discouraged. The qualification for a viable emote referencing his existence is more a matter of execution
-- @WhyEssEff
- To be honest, I broke this rule, so it's pretty much moot. Just run it by me first in DMs or matrix. Vaush is a bit of a dead horse, so to speak, so they're still generally discouraged. The qualification for a viable emote referencing his existence is more a matter of execution
- No desecration of religious imagery. This includes things like burning Israeli/Saudi flag emojis. If you can modify the flags while still accurately representing countries without including said imagery, it is much preferred.
- A grey area can be argued around whether the symbol has colloquially evolved past its religious origins (one example of this that can be relatively agreed upon is the Union Jack, which is more a symbol of colonialism if anything). See rule 7 for how to litigate this.
- Nothing sexually explicit or overtly horny is allowed
- :hentai-free:
- No sectarianism in submissions. Pro-tendency content is fine, but we will not accept content degrading specific tendencies.
- No gore, no SA, no sui-bait. Nothing that could reasonably trigger a comrade.
- If you think you're touching on a grey area with a submission, message @whyesseff:matrix.org to clear it before you post.
- DISCLAIMER: Clearing does not necessarily mean that I'll add it, just that it's alright to submit and the rules will not be the barrier to its addition
-- @WhyEssEff
- DISCLAIMER: Clearing does not necessarily mean that I'll add it, just that it's alright to submit and the rules will not be the barrier to its addition
- No content that breaks the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.
Emoji are added to the codebase periodically. Emoji may or may not be accepted and the dev team has final decision.
All images submitted must be ones you have the right to share with the project. By posting images in this comm, you are agreeing that you have permission to share this image with the project.
Hexbear Code Of Conduct, ToS, Privacy Policy, etc all still apply.
Emote repository, periodically updated on the Hexbear Code-Op.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think at this point we can safely say restoring the emoji is fine. There's historical context that makes the representation awkward, which is why we had the position we did and I don't think it was necessarily a wrong position at the time. The last two years have resulted in a lot of shifts on the pros and cons list so to speak.
I think a lot of the reason it's taken so long to finally have this discussion out had to do with the inertia of having already made a decision and having one of the biggest assholes on the site make it one of his weird personal axes to grind against The Accursed Mods.
The Nakba happened in 1948.
And the great march of return was last trump term! Liberal Zionist brainworms burrowed deep
You called it a "Holocaust emoji" literally an hour before saying it's fine to have it and it's just "awkward" representation. That seems like a pretty quick (and major) shift in sentiment, especially considering you gave site bans out for long-time contributors disagreeing with a position you changed your mind on within an hour.
Could you, I don't know, unban Z and just ignore posts that upset you or disagree with you unless they actually require mod action (like they have slurs or threats in them)? Is it really necessary to ban people for taking a different position than you (even if abrasively)? [and ignoring that you are now saying you are taking the position that the emoji is fine]. Is there no room to extend any form of grace in arguments that ultimately don't actually harm you?
Holy fucking shit I never knew the site was this corrupt.
My faith in this site's admins has honestly been in the toilet ever since the URL expiration incident. Nothing surprises me. "Is it incompetence, corruption, or plain flippin' laziness?" to quote Dan Bull's "Somebody Call a Doctor!"
This level of behavior warrants at least a demote and long post on self crit. If users aren't supposed to walk away from mistakes, why shouldn't moderators(or admins) be held to a higher standard?
The last time a mod "self-crit," it was some self-indulgent post about how they're 100% right and the unwashed user masses ain't shit.
What else is there to ask for? You know as well as I do that its unlikely to even get a self crit post at all, much less anything more.
Wow that was only nine months ago? Feels like way longer
Oh wow, I'd forgotten about REgon
I Remember that one
My sentiment has not shifted on this point at all. My feelings have for this entire time been that there just isn't a great resolution to any of this that wouldn't upset people. You either have an emoji that draws visual comparison to the generational trauma of the holocaust, or we have to obscure the visuals which also cedes the Star of David to Zionists.
My describing it as a Holocaust emoji was glib and I apologize for that, but my point was that is an optically upsetting emoji given the context of the holocaust, which was the explicit reasoning why the israel-cool emoji switch happened in the first place.
I did not ban Zposter, and Zposter was absolutely not banned for his position on the emoji.
Being banned for "PLEASE TOUCH GRASS AND ORGANIZE" is pretty fucked up too. That truly applies to literally every person posting on a forum, but sure, ban someone for being a jerk but admins like you can tell people to fuck off, you can say you're playing whac a mole with assholes (but it wasn't you who banned Z), and call a burning zionist flag a Holocaust emoji, and that's not hostility?
Come on, half the people on this site get hostile the moment they are in argument, but who gets banned is pretty inconsistent. People are way too obsessed with seeing a mod action whenever they don't like something they've read. I can't tell you how many times I've responded to call out some shitty comment only for a mod to remove it even though I never report it. Unless it's outright threatening or bigoted, there's no need to erase everything you don't want to see. People can block it, or we can hash it out. What is the point of talking to people if they're only ever allowed to agree with you or one of you has to go?
Please do more self crit to earn back some goodwill with the community
Also see prof owls comments to see why your protective feelings toward the Israeli flag aren't compelling to the majority of users