this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
111 points (96.6% liked)

Fuck AI

6608 readers
947 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
111
Using AI Made Doctors Worse at Spotting Cancer Without Assistance (time.com)
submitted 7 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 20 points 7 months ago
  • Three months before AI was introduced, the adenoma detection rate (ADR) was around 28%.
  • Three months after AI was introduced, the rate dropped to 22% when clinicians were unassisted by AI.
  • The study found that AI did help endoscopists with detection when used, but once the assistance was removed, clinicians were worse at detection.

What a strange place to be. Detection went up with AI, which is good. But, now you're at the mercy of the AI companies, hoping they don't double the price, and if you can't pay, you end up worse than where you started.

Also, this quote stood out to me.

“Often, we expect there to be a human overseeing all AI decision-making but if the human experts are putting less effort into their own decisions as a result of introducing AI systems this could be problematic.”

YES. I see this all the time. My coworkers tend to rubberstamp the AI generated code. Which makes sense. If they were too lazy to think through a problem—why would they suddenly be meticulous in fact-checking AI slop?