this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
81 points (95.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

3079 readers
462 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kamala Harris has said that she currently has no desire to re-enter “the system” of American politics because it is “broken”.

On Thursday night the Democratic party’s defeated presidential nominee, who replaced Joe Biden late in the 2024 campaign after he dropped his re-election bid, gave her first interview since losing the election to Donald Trump, talking to Stephen Colbert on The Late Show.

After she announced she will not run for the governorship of California just a day earlier, Harris told the TV show that it was about something more “basic” than whether she wanted to run for something else instead – with the subtext being whether she will attempt a White House run again in 2028.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When did she ever claim she intended to fix anything? She openly said she couldn’t think of anything she’d do differently from Biden.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

She openly said she couldn’t think of anything she’d do differently from Biden.

And followed it up by promising to appoint a republican to her cabinet.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As the candidate who lost the election, she's literally the only person who had the power to issue a recount.

She failed in that responsibility. Despite the 2016 election interference, and Jan 6th. Trump has never had a fair election, and she chose to ignore that in favor of respect?

Please. Respect is earned. Not given. Especially when the protection of our democracy comes with it.

Any reasonable, spine-having American would have challenged the results immediately rather that talk about how broken shit got because they failed in their ultimate responsibility as an American.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would they call for a recount? There was no reason to believe the results were inaccurate. After the election, her own staff admitted it was all a grift, and their internal polling never once showed her polling ahead of Trump.

https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/big-revelation-by-kamala-harriss-advisers-say-internal-polling-never-showed-the-vp-was-ahead-of-donald-trump/amp_articleshow/115781618.cms

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Why would they call for a recount?

Reason 1: Trumps 2016 election interference Reason 2: Jan 6th Reason 3 - 37: Trumps 34 felonies for election interference

There has never been better reason to call for a recount during a US election. Ever. Any thought otherwise is irrational and dangerous to our democracy.

Especially considering Reagan won 16/18 swing states at the height of his popularity. And Trump just won a statistically impossible 18/18 swing states despite Covid ravaging his voter base?

I don't give a single personal fuck about how Kamala was polling for the election.

I do however, give a massive fuck about her spinelessly ignoring her duty to challenge the outcome of this election. Without that challenge, we now have permantaly compromised presidential elections, and every branch of the government stacked with idiot sycophants unwilling to protect democratic law over Trumpian will.

The very security and trust of our elections are now permanantly shattered because Democrats wanted to protect decorum rather than fucking Democracy.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Reagan won 49 out of 50 states at the hight of his popularity. His opponent Mondale won his home state of Minnesota, making it the only state with a history of continually voting Democrat for presidency back beyond 1988.

It is not hard to believe that trump swept the swing states, politics is much less regional and more national than it was in Reagan's era.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You Blue MAGA’s are just as unhinged as Red MAGA.