this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
1189 points (97.9% liked)
Microblog Memes
9387 readers
2926 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Parents fight that because then they can't have the older kids take care of the younger kids when they get home from school.
and those parents should be fought by cps
It's not the parent's fault the media has made them terrified of everything that they can't let their kids just go around the neighborhood while they're at work.
yes, but if they're afraid of that they shouldn't be having their other kids watch over their younger ones
What's the alternative?
hiring a babysitter
All the highschoolers are at school, the people left over are expensive.
maybe they should have thought about it before getting a small human
So your take is that only wealthy people should reproduce?
if having enough money to stop working to take care of your kid for a few years is considered wealthy, then yes.
Between high rent and low wages, 99% of americans do not and could never have the funds to go 4 years without income. Are you really that disconnected?
owning a house eliminates the rent argument and low wages only effects future wealth not current wealth. Wealth has nothing to do with current income.
Are you being intentionally obtuse?