Progressive Politics

3028 readers

391 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

411

Bad optics (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what I've been repeatedly asking you.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems to mean that he wasn't favorable at all.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wait hangon, is this all because you're interpreting positive approval of a contentious political figure from 1/3 of a population as not popular?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You realize that the figure includes black people right?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So... do... they not count?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The question is optics of the oppressor.

When someone tells they need to be civil and quiet and unobtrusive so straight, white, cis males will support them, and cites King, they're either wildly misinformed of history or siding with the oppressor.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even including black people MLK was factually overwhelmingly unpopular.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

... Except with black people, right?