this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
1073 points (98.6% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7629 readers
706 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's an astroturfed topic, sold as desirable for esthetic reasons or as a BS health issue.
Only a hyper-consumerist society would promote unnecessary medical procedures.
And only gullible consumers would buy that.
Sexual prudishness is definitely there in your backward country but that can exist with or whitout foreskins.
Not the reason.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's obviously you working backwards from your opinions on America. Nobody advertises it here nor have they in a generation or two. It's an assumed default to the point that anti circumcision activists often have to argue with partners and sometimes circumcision is done without parental consent.

Here's Wikipedia on the history of the practice

But fundamentally, this comes from the late 19th and early 20th century where it was seen as an attempt to reduce masturbation and disease. There's no reason to believe that the doctors recommending it at the time didn't sincerely believe it to be for the best, it was just a time in which medical science was a bit bonkers.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

So you believe that they are more influenced by some 18th century bonkers doctors than present day perceived beauty standards, peer pressure and commercialised medicine?
And Wikipedia is not a reference BTW