Asklemmy

49265 readers

426 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

Should a drawing that was made using AI references be marked as "AI Generated Content"? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is not about any specific case. It's just a theoretical scenario that popped into my mind.

For context, in many places is required to label AI generated content as such, in other places is not required but it is considered good etiquette.

But imagine the following, an artist is going to make an image. Normal first step is search for references online, and then do the drawing taking reference from those. But this artists cannot found proper references online or maybe the artist want to experiment, and the artist decide to use a diffusion model to generate a bunch of AI images for reference. Then the artist procedes to draw the image taking the AI images as references.

The picture is 100% handmade, each line was manually drawn. But AI was used in the process of making this image. Should it have some kind of "AI warning label"?

What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why not do it the opposite way? Mark all the artisanal hand drawn images with some artisan guild marker that marks their "pureness". If the creator of the image is found to have ever looked at an image made by a mere peasant, kick them out of the guild.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Isn't that literally how art guilds in the middle ages operated? Like if you weren't part of the guild and tried to sell art you made, a mob from the guild would come along, destroy all your works, and probably beat the shit out of you for good measure?