this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
1317 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

7873 readers
294 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 253 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Facts over feelings??? Yup definitely an AI designed by a douche bag

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Funny thing is that an AI has no feelings, and such a phrase in the prompt would be interpreted simply as "be harshly true" instead of "be super confident on things that cannot be verified"

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 186 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's funny because the people who usually say that are the kind of people who prioritize their feelings over facts.

It's all projection with conservatives

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

This is the mirror that they made themselves and it gives them exactly what they think they can handle. But facts over feels will make for some great tweet meltdowns. 🍿

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'd bet a lot on "Facts over feelings" being one of those hardcoded phrases that Grok was made to use whenever Grok is asked to present facts.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 19 points 1 month ago

Which is hilarious, because you know it was put in there to "own the libs," but instead these chucklefucks get it thrown back in their faces.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago

That is absolutely the best part

[–] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It uses "Facts over feelings" as a diss against the very group of people who would normally use it

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 14 points 1 month ago

If you search for Grok in the tweet history, Grok has said it in almost every single message in the past three days. I can't laugh any harder at this

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

feelings

(Your comment is over mine)

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I was going to complain your comment is lower, but I think I might have to admit it's over.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Problem? Seems as good a way as any to say conflicting feelings can go suck a dick when they need to reconcile with these facts over here. Dumb to get peeved over that.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Facts over feelings" has been used almost exclusively by conservative "influencers" for the last decade (despite them not really caring about facts, mind you). It's a dog whistle at this point for being a massive dickwad.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe unlearn that or learn to throw it back?

Letting the other camp "own" signs like fake news, 👌🏼, or facts over feelings is basically cooperating with them & validating whatever they decide those signs mean for the rest of us. Yet the literal meaning of those words (& signs) can serve anyone. Language can be creative, no?

Instead of ceding to them like a bunch of feeble losers (and implying we only argue with feelings), maybe we should reappropriate what was given, stir confusion, apply some creativity to make those signs serve us against the "dickwads" we oppose?

That purity mentality of recoiling from anything "tainted" by those we oppose isn't useful. It's better to restore, redeem, create.