I guess the point is that it shows the correlation between processed food and cancer is statistically significant. As in there is definitely a link, and this meta analysis shows good evidence this link exists. Even if the impact is small.

As for the day to day impact of this study, I'm not sure there is one. Processed food is already on WHOs list of things that definitely cause cancer.

Getting a colorectal cancer probability in a lifetime is about 0.04, eating hotdog adds 8% to it or ~0.003.

Depending on the average amount of processed meats eaten, it could also show not eating a hot dog every day will reduce your risk of cancer by about that much. It's probably only important in the cumulative though. When we have studies like this for many foods, you could put together a diet that reduces your chance of cancer by 20 or 30%, say. But one food's impact like this is probably only important to scientists.

So getting back to your original question:

Like... is it written to excite anxiety?

Yes. Anxiety drives clicks which drives revenue.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (6 children)

1000 people show up to the annual picnic. If we remove hot dogs from the market, and dont serve them at our picnic, or any picnic, ever, 40 of those 1000 people are going to get colorectal cancer.

If we do serve hot dogs at our picnic (and every other picnic), 43 people are going to get colorectal cancer at some point in their lives.

Pass the mustard.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What if you could have a grilled fish instead though?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mercury.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't that only an issue with some types of fish though, like tuna?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fish are carnivorous, and mercury is bioaccumulative. So, larger fish tend to have higher concentrations than smaller fish, but pretty much all fish have some level of mercury. There is no "safe" concentration.

But the real problem with your scenario is that I'd prefer hunger pangs over fish, grilled or otherwise.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Freshwater fish also exist, or areas with less contamination. If you won't eat fish though that sounds more like a you problem.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Freshwater fish can still have mercury. Even farmed fish can have mercury contamination, if their feed is sourced from the wild.

If you won't eat fish though that sounds more like a you problem.

Nah, I'm perfectly happy with my hot dogs. You're the one eating broken thermometers and fluorescent lights.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (12 replies)