this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
430 points (98.9% liked)

News

36018 readers
2173 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah, this one makes complete sense if there were warrants out for his arrest in Mexico. We have extradition laws with Mexico (and most every other country in the Americas). Which is why we know most of these deportations are bologna. If someone actually had a warrant out for their arrest and was arrested for anything in the U.S. they would have been flagged for extradition when their ID was taken. If we couldn't correctly ID them, then there was no way for the U.S. to suddenly claim they had charges against them in another country. Any way you put it together, the executive branch is lying.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

He was standing with the president of Mexico as recently as 2 weeks ago. The idea that he had a warrant out for his arrest at that time is clearly bogus.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/4/boxer-julio-cesar-chavez-jr-likely-to-soon-be-deported-to-mexico-sheinbaum

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has announced she expects boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jr to soon be deported from the United States to serve a sentence for arms trafficking and organised crime.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

I think Mexico might have a problem with orginized crime, but hey who doesn't! Certainly not america....

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So Mexico is lying as well now then, that's not good. Because Mexico confirmed it from what we know right?

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've heard nothing from either government yet. Still currently accusations, no results no evidence. A lot of people connecting some dots, which are that Chavez Jr is recently married to an ex of the El Chapo family, and maybe this is meant to be some sort of example by the Trump admin for whataver reason. If you look back on Chavez Jr's history, he's basically a young rich kid in Mexico and that meant hanging out with the other young rich kids including the rich kids of crime families. Which he's now marrying an in-law of.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico said on Friday that she expects the prominent boxer Julio César Chávez Jr. to be deported to Mexico to face charges of organized crime and arms trafficking

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/03/world/americas/mexico-arrest-warrant-boxer-julio-cesar-chavez-jr.html

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This shit is truly insane. He's not changed anything about his life recently besides fighting Jake Paul.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So are you claiming mexico is lying? Or Mexico is telling the truth? Or the U.S is lying, which Mexico said was false

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This weapons charge would surely have been a problem when he fought Jake Paul 4 days prior, right? Why do you think it is suddenly a problem afterwards?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did it make the U.S. money before the fight?

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It sold out an arena in Anaheim. So yes it made money. I heard Chavez Jr. was guaranteed 750k with about ~$3mil bonus based on the PPV sales. PPV money is notorious slow and takes ~2 months to be received.