this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
45 points (95.9% liked)
askchapo
23062 readers
358 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I believe Franz Fanon made the argument that in some developing countries, the domestic class divide is less significant than the international class divide, and that there can be a logic to persuing a class truce. If a country becomes colonized, the domestic bourgeoisie stands to lose their positions (at least potentially) so there's a greater degree of shared interests. This is in contrast to a more old school perspective, which would argue that a class truce isn't really possible, that the bourgeoisie will never let up, and that attempting to persue that course is reactionary and opens the door to opportunism.
I don't have a strong opinion on it because I'm in the imperial core, I think either approach can be valid depending on the circumstances.
Some section of the domestic bourgeois in colonized countries always has the option to betray their nation by becoming comprador capitalist that represent outside imperialists interests. The working class doesn't have that option, so there is still a fundamental class divide. But the capitalist class is also devided in that case and there might be temporary alliances with the capitalists who aren't compradors to fight for national liberation as a prerequisite for revolution.