this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
262 points (98.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3120 readers
671 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"justices in the majority did not explain why they decided this case the way they did." oh great. another precedent thrown out.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the problem I've always had with precedent. It's not law. It's just "well these other judges did it this way so I guess I will too."

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

well in this case they are throwing out the precedence of explaining their ruling.