this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1128 readers
33 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 9 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

"I'm a rationalist because they let me put "quantum computer scientist (not physicist) who's always right (despite the suffering of fools)" on my nametag"

So what does the name of his blog stand for?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

The name of his blog was a reference that he thinks he was born in the wrong time, because in Shtetls people of his clear high intelligence would be assigned a wife (and get high social status).

Here is Sneerclub talking about it a while back. Dec 2022 is apparently 2 years ago for reddit.

E: Do note I can't recall where he wrote about this, so I might be misremembering, or taking what we said in hyperbole about it for the real thing.

E2: unrelated to the blog name, I did think of incels/untitled/this kind of stuff like the troubles of lonely nerds/NDs not getting dating and going to the wrong places when I read the last part of this question Dr NerdLove answered, the 'to be perfectly blunt' part. And just how common the 'you can't be mad at me now' thing is.

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

This appears to be the explainer: https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=476 , also referenced here: https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=5769

Edit: bonus cursed findings: https://web.archive.org/web/20071006184928/http://scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=260

why do we, as a society, provide food stamps for the hungry but not sex stamps for the celibate?

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 12 points 15 hours ago

Well found.

Also I love that the conversation almost certainly started with a comment about how everyone assumes they'd be the in the king's court the cast majority of people would have been some variant of peasant farmer for the vast majority of history. But somehow he still would have totally been the Chief Rabbi, given the most beautiful woman, and generally be a king. I wasn't there obviously but either he missed the point or they all missed the point. Even when talking specifically about how you can't choose the circumstances of your birth or their consequences he still can't imagine himself not being the king.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)