this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
740 points (98.7% liked)

News

30265 readers
3950 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She finds the whole idea absurd. To Prof Marci Shore, the notion that the Guardian, or anyone else, should want to interview her about the future of the US is ridiculous. She’s an academic specialising in the history and culture of eastern Europe and describes herself as a “Slavicist”, yet here she is, suddenly besieged by international journalists keen to ask about the country in which she insists she has no expertise: her own. “It’s kind of baffling,” she says.

In fact, the explanation is simple enough. Last month, Shore, together with her husband and fellow scholar of European history, Timothy Snyder, and the academic Jason Stanley, made news around the world when they announced that they were moving from Yale University in the US to the University of Toronto in Canada. It was not the move itself so much as their motive that garnered attention. As the headline of a short video op-ed the trio made for the New York Times put it, “We Study Fascism, and We’re Leaving the US”.

Starkly, Shore invoked the ultimate warning from history. “The lesson of 1933 is: you get out sooner rather than later.” She seemed to be saying that what had happened then, in Germany, could happen now, in Donald Trump’s America – and that anyone tempted to accuse her of hyperbole or alarmism was making a mistake. “My colleagues and friends, they were walking around and saying, ‘We have checks and balances. So let’s inhale, checks and balances, exhale, checks and balances.’ I thought, my God, we’re like people on the Titanic saying, ‘Our ship can’t sink. We’ve got the best ship. We’ve got the strongest ship. We’ve got the biggest ship.’ And what you know as a historian is that there is no such thing as a ship that can’t sink.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krashmo@lemmy.world -4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

No one else in America has kids huh? Her kids are the only ones that matter in this equation. Get the fuck out of here with that GOP "but think of the children" logic

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Parents have a particular attachment to the safety of their own children.

That's not a political statement, it's just the reality of human nature. It's also usually seen as ethical.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I notice you not saying you have kids.

Let me know in a few years when you understand, because all your "fuck saving your own kids from the fascists, you should be in the street not on the news living out history lessons" bravado is a real tell for "I have absolutely no idea what it's like to have kids".

Your extreme lack of empathy and insistence on everyone doing it your way makes me surprised you aren't a conservative yourself.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I have two kids but that doesn't make any difference. You don't need to have kids to understand that running away from fascists doesn't work. Being a parent doesn't change any of the facts on the ground. If anything it makes adopting my point of view more urgent.

You're making an emotional appeal to our natural instinct for survival. Well, history tells us that the longer we wait and the fewer of us stand and fight the harder it will be to win so how does your admonition to empathize with this woman help increase the chance that my kids will survive? The answer is that it doesn't. Every person that leaves makes it that much more likely that I'll have to be one of the people to die fighting fascism in America or that my kids will be casualties in that war. Instead of asking me to empathize with her why aren't you asking her to empathize with the people who can't leave? Those are the people I have empathy for. Not some privileged academic who didn't even stick around long enough to hold up a sign at a protest.

You're jumping through an awful lot of hoops to try and paint obviously cowardly behavior as something else. My question is why? I'm the one advocating that we should all fight for those of us who can't fight for themselves. This lady could fight but chose not to because she was afraid of what might happen to her and her family. Which one of those attitudes do you think is more necessary right now? Which one of us would you rather have in your local community? You may not like the blunt nature of my comments but in case you haven't noticed we're well past the point that polite conversation is part of the required solution. I certainly don't know everything but I do know that this lady isn't going to show up when shit hits the fan in your town, but someone like me might. Maybe you should spend some time thinking about that fact.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I have two kids

No you don't. You made them up right now.

Her fight is far more public than yours by an enormous factor.

She got her message across to millions by putting her money where her mouth is and leaving, whereas you're just carping to a few hundred on lemmy calling her names for standing up in a very public way that got more headlines in one day than your carping on the internet will do in your lifetime. You're just undermining her very important message about how bad things are and how much worse they're gonna be.

Your bravado is as fake as your fantasy children are.

Your anti-intellectualism, your lack of empathy and your fake bravado all point to you being a rightwing troll just trying to lessen the impact of her crucial lessons from history by discrediting her for taking a stand.