this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
1237 points (99.5% liked)

News

36018 readers
1906 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several service members told advocacy groups they felt like pawns in a political game and assignment was unnecessary

California national guards troops and marines deployed to Los Angeles to help restore order after days of protest against the Trump administration have told friends and family members they are deeply unhappy about the assignment and worry their only meaningful role will be as pawns in a political battle they do not want to join.

Three different advocacy organisations representing military families said they had heard from dozens of affected service members who expressed discomfort about being drawn into a domestic policing operation outside their normal field of operations. The groups said they have heard no countervailing opinions.

“The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn’t the kind of national security we signed up for,” said Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative, which represents the interests of military spouses, children and veterans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

They can be court martialed either way. Literally an entire movie about it and a phrase that gets used everyday. Cache 22

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure and once the military court sees the order was illegal you’re not going to be held responsible

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hope military court works more fairly than civilian court.

[–] Habitforming@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Pretty much the opposite. Civilian courts generally offer more constitutional protections. Military courts can say something was contrary to "good order and discipline" aka my favorite article of the UCMJ - Article 134 - and lol, you're fucked.

[–] nik9000@programming.dev 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's a book called Catch 22. Looks like the made a movie of it. The book is the funniest thing I've ever read. Made me think about how crazy fighting is. Sort of like a funny Slaughterhouse-Five.

Neither mentioned illegal orders as far as I remember. Was the movie quite different?

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 3 points 8 months ago

We read very different books. I thought the first half was hilarious, but it lulled me into a comfort of the absurdity and the banality that set up an absolutely devastating second half.

I think it's one of the greatest books I've ever read, but I don't think it was a comedy.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Catch 22 isn’t about illegal orders. The contradiction is more about your own sanity/safety.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Surely it's a Catch 22, not a hidden supply of 22s stashed away somewhere?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

No thats actually cache 21, duh!