this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
213 points (99.1% liked)

politics

31320 readers
2272 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Links, please? I haven't seen anything suggesting that, yet.

I'm probably OK. I'm straight. I'm White. Though I am agnostic and don't buy the State Religion behind Project 2025.

My wife, however, is Black, Bisexual, and Pagan, four strikes, and now I'm a race traitor for having married her, so there's my strike.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just to point out it doesn't matter how white you are if you say something they don't agree with.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or do something they don't agree with. Like marrying a Black bisexual pagan woman.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

100% gamer chick too. I'm lucky to have her, and even as we check out girls together, I just look, because I know I have a good girl at home. :)

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Or even look at them wrong.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, take a good look at Luigi and how hard they're trying to blame him. You don't get much more white than Italian. Maybe Scottish, but it's close.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, I actually think it is very possible to be more white than Italians—they weren’t even considered white in America until the last 100 years or so.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, this. I'm quite sure if I ventured back to the place where I grew up I could find more than a few people that would consider Italians as non-white.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Which is kind of funny when I think about the casual racism that was thrown around by my Italian immigrant Grandmother when I was a kid.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

You forgot about the discrimination of Italians in America.

Just like US was no fan of Irish immigrants either.

Really just pick a country and at some point the US has probably discriminated against people from there.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ask a white supremacist if Italians are white

There is a lot of anti-Italian sentiment. Especially South Italian, where folks start looking much darker in skin

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

My google-fu hasn't up to this point. In fact, I get lots of results saying that Americans are not welcome as asylum seekers in my googling. Your single link only shows places that take American immigrants, not places welcoming American refugees. In fact, New Zealand is suffering from a Conservative-inflicted recession that is making things difficult for immigrants and natives alike, and Australia has some serious restrictions on immigrants (a close friend of mine did that route and barely made the cut). And Canada? Despite a victory for the Liberal Party and 'elbows up' regarding American rhetoric, they still have lots of people angry about how immigration has been handled.

If you actually have links to help get victimised people out of the USA, maybe instead of 'why don't u google it urself', maybe post those links. That's FAR more helpful than the whole 'go do it urself!' response. :)

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From a non- paywall article about Hannah Kreager:

Her pending claim for protection in the Great White North could be a landmark case, the American believes.

'I'm here in Canada with a terrific lawyer taking up my unprecedented case: seeking asylum from the United States of America on the grounds of violation of human rights,' she posted online.

'My case is a precedent-setting one, and if successful, could make asylum for trans people in the U.S. possible.'

I hope she's successful. The Safe Third Country agreement needs to be ended. Until that time, the path to claiming refuge status from the US will be extremely expensive and onerous and not likely to be successful. The canadian government needs to be called out on their hypocrisy and refusal to 'rock the boat' by ending it.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if the Safe Third Country agreement would apply to this, since the US wouldn't be the Third Country. Wouldn't that only apply if she went from somewhere else in the world to the US and then to Canada. She's from the US, not from somewhere else coming to Canada via the US. I think if it did she would've been deported immediately.

But yeah ending the Safe Third Country agreement needs to be a priority. They're sending people to a gulag down there FFS, it's definitely not a safe third country for asylum seekers by any stretch of the imagination.

You're right, the STCA does not apply to US citizens. But as long as the US is considered "safe", refugee claims are going to be impossible to argue.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for these. They don't make it clear that Canada is a valid destination for LGBTQ+ folks to seek asylum from, but they do indicate that there is discussion in Canada. Have to see how the referenced cases go, though.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Just go North. That was key in slavery and Vietnam. And today.