this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
583 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

71030 readers
4054 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 62 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'd rather see mandatory rear running lights. The amount of people who can't be arsed to turn on their lights in bad visibility conditions is too damn high.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

and on the opposite side don’t turn on your emergency lights while driving in bad weather. you’re only causing confusion by making it seem like you have turn signals on if i can’t see both blinkers.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The hazards also override your turn signals so I now have no idea when you are going to attempt lane change.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The hazards are to indicate you are stopped and now a hazard.

Only when you are stopped and now a hazard. Your car becomes a blinking light. We have road rules for blinking lights, so it SHOULD be saying one specific thing.

Thank you for coming to this road safety talk.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

They also indicate slow moving road hazards like a semi carrying an oversized load

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

and honestly i have the same problem with that intended use. it often looks like a stopped car is attempting to turn out into traffic. IMO emergency lights should have a faster blink pattern or something to differentiate from turn signals.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Faster blink is already used to indicate that one of the lights is burned out. It's a consequence of the mechanical part that operates (used to operate) the blinking; less resistance caused by a burned out light means it blinks faster

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

There's a programmable flasher relay that does exactly this. It's specific to certain Toyota/Lexus and Subarus from the 2000s to mid-2010s, but it's something. I have one in my 2008 Sienna - the "emergency flasher" part is programmed to strobe, kinda like a tow truck. I like it.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Thats more an issue of using the same lamp for rear lights and turn signal

[–] mundane@feddit.nu 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It used to be mandatory with always on rear lights in Sweden (you couldn't even turn them off). But an adaptation to EU rules removed that requirement. 😓

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I strongly doubt it was genuinely linked to that. There are EU countries where having lights on all the time is mandatory.

[–] mundane@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was an EU rule about ten years ago that stipulated that rear lights are no longer mandatory in daylight. The reasoning being to save on fuel. Which is a ridiculous reason, even more so with today's LED lights.

I don't know about other EU countries but this was the reason that Sweden removed the requirement. All cars in Sweden used to have the rear lights turned on at all time, even if the light switch was in the off position, but that changed around the same time.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

that stipulated that rear lights are no longer mandatory in daylight.

I don't believe these were ever mandatory in the EU? UK never had such requirement.

Edit:

What I mean is there are EU countries where lights are still mandatory and countries where it isn't so I cannot see how it could be linked to EU requirements either way.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Rear fog lights on all vehicles (some vehicles have them now).

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it's forbidden to use rear fog lights under rain (it's more confusing than helpful)

if you live somewhere dry, that's not a concern. But here it rains 1 day in 3

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't know where you are but rear fogs aren't illegal in the rain here and from experience they are nothing but helpful in heavy rain and white out snow. I am always so so sooo glad when someone in front of me is using them when it's absolutely pouring. You really have to not be paying attention not to notice that it's two lights and not three and somehow mistake them for stop lights.

In fact, Transport Canada recommends using them in fog, rain, or snow.

Use only if driving in fog, rain or snow as these lights can be confused with stop lights, distracting other drivers.

https://tc.canada.ca/en/road-transportation/safety-standards-vehicles-tires-child-car-seats/using-your-vehicle-lights-see-be-seen

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

II. - Le ou les feux arrière de brouillard ne peuvent être utilisés qu'en cas de brouillard ou de chute de neige. ☞ https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006842263

Feux de brouillard arrière : ils sont indiqués uniquement en cas de brouillard ou de chute de neige (mais jamais sous la pluie en raison de leur trop grande intensité)https://public.codesrousseau.fr/conseils-pratiques/909-feux-de-brouillard-avant-et-arriere-quand-les-utiliser.html

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Ça c'est de l'osti de merde comme on dit ici.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Yes that as well, I love mine and use them a lot. But that's a step above rear running lights. There's no god damn reasons the rear indicators shouldn't be on all the time.