this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
469 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

70934 readers
3435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 66 points 2 days ago (5 children)

This is like one of those cases where I'm kind of hoping they both lose somehow. Neither party are right in this case, Reddit is trying to claim copyright over content they have no rights to, and anthropic shouldn't be violating copyright without a licence.

But apparently you are actually allowed to violate copyright without a licence if you're an AI company because apparently llms are the future? So I guess Reddit are going to lose, which will be funny.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am squarely on the reddit should lose this side.

Anthropic may be breaking copyright, but not Reddit's copyright. Sure maybe Anthropic should be sued, but not by Reddit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Actually this case could be a good thing. The whole question of who owns user generated content needs hashing out, because no one seems to actually know.

Obviously the logical answer would be that the people who created it own the content, but that's never been officially decided.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because that's the only common sense conclusion to make, but that doesnt make rich fucks more money

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah maybe we shouldn't have the case in the US where money rules everything.

EU get on it.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

The whole question of who owns user generated content needs hashing out, because no one seems to actually know.

It's billionaires. They know. They just sometimes squable over it like two year olds. But they know. They pay lawyers to make it clear in thousand page terms of service documents.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

Judge finds that anthropic has to pay restitution to the reddit users. Affirms that posts belong to users.

Well, I can dream.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 13 points 2 days ago

You mean Reddit, the company that would be very happy if Anthropic did the exact same thing, but paid Reddit first?

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

"Violating copyright without a licence" is a lovely turn of phrase. You must be the valedictorian of the Lemmy School of Copyright.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it violating copyright to browse the web?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

I think it's acceptable as long as you don't learn anything.