this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
493 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

23853 readers
3193 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
493
exit (dubvee.org)
submitted 4 days ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FINALLY! This has always annoyed me. If you’re gonna go through all the trouble of identifying that I want to exit, just DO it.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It’s not really much extra effort though

They just added so e text to the __repr__ method on the exit callable object

That’s much easier than figuring out if your running this interactively and trying to figure out if this is going to break stuff.

[–] scott@lemmy.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lemme golf that

~ $ python
Python 3.12.10 (main, Apr  9 2025, 18:13:11) [Clang 18.0.3 (https://android.googlesource.com/toolchain/llvm-project d8003a456 on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> class x:
...  def __repr__(s):
...   exit(0)
...
>>> xit = x()
>>> xit
~ $

Not that hard

[–] brian@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

repr is generally assumed to be side effect free and cheap to run, so things like debuggers tend to show repr of things in scope, including possibly exit

also then it behaves differently between repl and script, since repr never gets run. to do it properly it has to be a new repl keyword I imagine, but I still don't know if I'm sold on the idea

[–] scott@lemmy.org 3 points 3 days ago

Good points. You're right, it does need solved at the shell level. Glad they did so.