this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
121 points (85.0% liked)

News

29860 readers
3261 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 62 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Microsoft founder Bill Gates says that most of his $200bn (£150bn) fortune will be spent on improving health and education services in Africa over the next 20 years.

The 69-year-old said that "by unleashing human potential through health and education, every country in Africa should be on a path to prosperity".

Speaking in Ethiopia's capital Addis Ababa, he also urged Africa's young innovators to think about how to build Artificial Intelligence (AI) to improve healthcare on the continent.

Gates announced last month that he would give away 99% of his vast fortune by 2045, by when his foundation planned to end its operations.

So no, he's not giving it away in traditional sense. It's still directed spending according to what he believes is correct. Over 20 years. So same old but with AI.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

It’s in a trust. That’s now how wills and stuff work. The whole point of paying attorneys and shit is for this kind of stuff. They are getting paid handsomely to make sure it happens. No reason to get disbarred for money that will be seized if you’re caught.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Has anyone else spent that kinda money effectively ? If I was billionaire looking to donate my wealth I’d probably donate it to Gates fund.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Not $200B no. Here's the list of total dollars, but no data on effectiveness. Notice Bill is already on this list while alive in the #2 spot:

source

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

China has, with different strings attached.

As for individuals or NGOs, I don't know. That said, as GiveDirectly have shown, it's not complicated to spend effectively if you don't want to exercise significant control. All you have to do is give the money directly to poor people. That's about it. They will circulate it and recirculate it in the local economy, multiplying the effects.

Or you could get China to build the equivalent of a fifth of the B&R infrastructure on your dime without the strings attached. Trains, roads, ports, power generation, etc.

Or if you wanted to help curb the ability of someone else accumulating as much as you did, establish funds for worker co-op startup firms, unions and socialist politicians' campaigns.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pretty sure the work he’s done on helping to eradicate malaria, HIV and tuberculosis is more effective than giving them cash.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Since 2013 or so with the Belt and Road Initiative.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 0 points 3 days ago

doesn't that just put poor countries into debt with China?

not really the same at all. sounds pretty neoliberal if you ask me

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago

So. No way he's living to 2045. After he dies I bet someone just changes everything. This won't happen. Even in the hamstring version he has written up at the moment.