this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
1348 points (97.9% liked)

politics

23706 readers
2737 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 60 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I blame it mostly on Biden refusing to drop out, but yes political consultant bullshitters and billionaires are a huge problem. AIPAC especially.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

The ire I hold for the DNC is difficult to understate. They outright lied to us about Biden's health and ability to lead, despite the populous being blatantly aware of it, and spent 4 years pissing away their time to protect us from fascist uprising. It's literally their jobs to prevent this kind of thing and they dropped the ball so hard to protect corporate interests. This is but two points in what I'm sure would be a massive litany of complaints if i were to be exhaustive. They are utterly worthless to the working class American and yet we are stuck with these bloodsuckers.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I'm fully convinced they slow rolled the Trump prosecution so that they could use him to fundraise. I'm half convinced they slow rolled it because they were going to just let it slide if it was clear Trump was going to stay out of politics, because the ghoul club looks out for each other behind the scenes.

And yeah, there's an actual laundry list of places where they fucked up hard on this last election. A non-exhaustive list includes:

  • Lying about Biden's condition/ not pushing him to step aside because the establishment democrats considers seniority to be the holiest of all political attributes. It's why they were SO pissed that Obama cut Hillary off and they went on about "it's her turn!" in '16. Tbh, it's probably just as much a part of why they shut Sanders out in '16 as him being progressive. Anyway, this meant that we had basically a sham primary. Yes, it was a real primary, but we all know the incumbent always wins the primary, and they lied over and over about his condition until that shit was over with. So, no, I don't think you can really say it was a fair election, because voters were deliberately deceived by their own party.

  • Colluding to get Biden put in. I know someone's going to come and tell me that the '20 primary was 100% legit and totally not sketchy at all, but I'll never forget Biden showing up to those debates looking like a freshly reanimated corpse and, all of the sudden, he wins South Carolina (which I do consider legitimate) and all the other candidates start dropping out and giving their delegates to him (which I consider illegitimate because it really smelled coordinated and allowing candidates to pledge their delegates forward is sketchy AF). To me, this is the original sin here. Biden wasn't a god awful president, but they knew he wasn't the best candidate they could possibly run, they knew his history, and I will never ever be convinced that they picked Kamala because she was the right person for the job. They picked Kamala because she landed some absolute body shots on Biden about racism in the primary debates, and they needed to clean that radioactive spill up. I think they felt that the most expedient means of doing so was for Joe to get Kamala. I don't think for two seconds that Kamala was Joe's choice. This wouldn't have been all bad if they'd committed to working on polishing Kamala up and getting her out there in the public eye and grooming her as a viable independent candidate a la Gore, but they didn't. They kinda just shoved her into the broom closet after Biden won and only dug her out after he blew his legs own off on the debate stage. So, that stupid fucking maneuver to shut Sanders out in '20 gave us a president that not many people were excited about; a VP that neither the president, nor the DNC, nor the people liked who would go on to be his natural successor on the campaign trail; all while ensuring that said VP had no distinct political image, and even, due to the righteous trait of seniority, forcing Kamala to assure voters that she absolutely adored Biden's unpopular policies.

  • The DNC didn't even trust their own candidates. Don't get me wrong, I don't think Kamala is God awful; I wouldn't have picked her, but she had enough good qualities to work with to stand on her own if they'd trusted her. This is especially true with Walz on her team; they had some real potential if the DNC had got the fuck out of the way and stopped focus grouping them to death. Instead, they picked Kamala and played up what little leftist cred she had and then foisted HRC's campaign staff on her, made her talk about limited means-tested small business aid, and got celebrities to make guest appearances. They got Walz for his incredible shit talking abilities, then muzzled him. They saw the campaign starting to make its own identity separate from Biden and screamed "NO, YOU'LL DISHONOR OUR SPECIAL BOY. HE WON'T KNOW, BUT WE WILL!" They saw the populist moment, the people crying out for change, and went "hey, shut up, offer them means tested tax assistance. Here's Obama lecturing down to our base, that always goes over well".

  • They abandoned their strategy of talking about what a dangerous fascist Trump was after that kid in Pennsylvania nearly started a GoFundMe for Trump's family. Trump didn't stop being a dangerous fascist, but the appearance of decency was more important than speaking the truth. If Trump didn't want to get his goddamn brains blown out, maybe don't go having fascist rallies in open fields. But it gave the perception that they didn't really believe that he was a dangerous fascist, that they were just saying it until they realized it was dangerous to say it. This was a huge mistake, imo.

[–] via_solaris@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

[[gif of Orson Welles clapping. I'm new to PieFed and don't know how to reply with a gif]]

Bravo! Thank you for saying this, and so well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)