this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
595 points (97.9% liked)

Games

38829 readers
1479 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Or people are used to this concept and accept it as normal instead of unethical behavior that should be illegal.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's basically like saying g all mmo's should illegal. Or that it is illegal to go out of business and close up shop without giving away all your code.

[–] Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's pretty much exactly what I'm saying. If you offer software that requires outside servers to run, you should be legally obligated to release the code used to run the servers if you discontinue supporting that software. That doesn't make mmo's any different, just a minor change to how they handle end of life.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you don't like how a company handles their end of life then don't buy from them. Trying to make it illegal is unnecessary as companies are already facing negative consequences for making poor EOL choices. I don't like forcing developers to create in a specific way, I'd rather they have freedom to choose.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What does releasing the code have to do with development decisions? I am a developer and this sentiment really confused me, so please elucidate.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They should be able to decide whether to open source or not. If people don't like their decision they shouldnt buy their game.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

At what point in the purchase cycle is it known that they won't? Because the right reserved in a EULA is not a guarantee of occurrence, so how does one make a decision when or when not to purchase?

Also, when single player games are being forced to be always online and are being affected, there is a real problem. If there is no valid tangible benefit to the player for a game to be online, and require the online component to play the game, it should be illegal.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Well, I knew the crew would be decommissioned and dissapear from day one. I'm not sure why people expected it to live forever. I understand people want to change things to be different, but the norm before was that online games are sunset. Its happened over and over.

And you would base your decision on prior actions of the company. Dont buy ubisoft until they prove they have fixed this problem. You already shouldnt be playing online games hosted by shitty companies, exactly for this reason. Most companies actually don't fuck their fan base over, and so its not an issue.