this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
294 points (98.7% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

6562 readers
92 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Something I've thought about is that religious tax exemptions in America aren't to prevent the non religious from taxing the religious. It's to prevent Christian majorities from taxing other religions out of existence.

[–] cdf12345@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago

The trade off was no tax on churches for no tax on higher education. Trump is going after colleges so it’s time to go after churches

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

it's super hard though to convince the IRS your non-christian org should be tax exempt than a christian one. in wording, it seems at face value like what you've said. but in practice it's the single greatest tool the christian hegemony has in this system of oppression.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Scientology had it figured out - all you have to do is infiltrate and doxx the IRS, then your ~~multi level marketing scheme~~ religion is official.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

We can change the tax code to allow tax exemptions for religious organizations with income/assets below a certain thresholds, with punitive measures (actual jail time) for hiding assets.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Or we could require that churches actually do some good with the money they collect in order to qualify for tax exempt status. There should be no religious exemption, if a church wants tax exempt status they should have to do something to deserve it like charity.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I think you are absolutely right.

It would be much simpler to just extend to them charitable expenditures, and only that.

The more charity they do, the less taxes they pay.