this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
545 points (99.3% liked)

News

29261 readers
4057 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And find a way to have it automatically sync to the cloud, with automatic release if certain reporting in parameters aren’t met

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

~~the ACLU Mobile Justice app does this~~

Holy shit they shut it down a month after dorito stain took office what the fuck

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

That app has been junk for several years. I think there was a change in permissions in one of the Android versions that made it useless, they never updated it.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bad timing, but I'm guessing they ran out of funding to continue app development, since now they have so much legal battles to do. The app was already broken, buggy, and barely functional for the past 5 years.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. The current best option is probably a regular video + cloud sync like Google Photos.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Or YouTube live

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Hopefully they don't start carrying something that jams signals to disable the ability for something to sync to a cloud.

If that ends up being the case, "evidence" of crimes isn't going to help anyone being victimized much. 😓

[–] ActuallyGoingCrazy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They've already had devices to capture cellular connections for a while now, I'd imagine jamming bands would be even easier.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

Signal jammers are available for purchase online and depending on purpose are affordable and compact.

That said; often they are illegal for civilians.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need a contraption where a cable is connecting your body cam to a friend following you, and the recording is synched through the cable to a storage device they hold. Then if SHTF, the friend can run with the footage they have and give it a reputable journalist or ACLU.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I feel like if you found a way to do a mesh net (ive been really into Meshtastic as of late, but the data throughput of LoRA would not cut it), and have other members of the mesh sync the file (encrypted and compressed) that would work. Share the unlock code with a friend or a small group, that way you always have backups on other people's devices.

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I would wonder if there's a self hosted option out there for video streaming (there's this?) that you could set up to mirror with a few friends, that way if your home every gets searched you've got a friend with copies that can get it to a journalist/lawyer

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I also, too, find lora Radio to be interesting. I think it has many applications to deal with tyranny. I could see them outlawing it at least for civilians.

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Lora is in the 915mhz ISM band in the USA. This part of the spectrum is full of high power transmissions, Lora runs on such low power that it's signals are pretty much below the noise floor. The FCC doesn't have the teeth to regulate what they already are supposed to regulate, they aren't going to bother with Lora. As far as communicating doing anything illegal or soon to be illegal shit, Signal is more reliable.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yea but the comment I replied to was talking about jamming, they'd probably be able to detect what frequency you are trasmitting on and jam those too. Only a hard-wired cable is immune to jamming.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All wireless technology would be a game of cat&mouse anyway, they cant jam everything, the product would just have to be developed to take advantage of multiple open or common parts of the spectrum, like the 2.4 or 5 ghz ranges used by wi-fi.

All hypothetical, im not a product designer nor an engineer who would be able to design the specifics.