this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
134 points (98.6% liked)
askchapo
22930 readers
226 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not about having a job, it's about contributing to society. All cultures and societies have ways of ridiculing and attempting to discipline those who are viewed as not contributing adequately to society. The USA is a hyper capitalist country, so that manifests itself as ridiculing people who don't have a job (as that's how you should contribute to society under the US model). There's also a built-in assumption that those without a job are "leeching off" of someone who does, or government assistance. But to answer your question, in other cultures and countries you won't be ridiculed for not having a job necessarily as the main thing, but you would be insulted for say not having kids, not taking care of/respecting the elderly, not supporting your children adequately, etc. For instance, the idea of charging your kid rent or putting your parents in a old folks home would be seen as alien and insulting in a number of countries outside of the USA, and people who do that would be ridiculed. What is seen as most important for contributing to society is different depending on culture. For some it's contributing to family, for some it's contributing to the greater collective, for some, like the general American culture, it's contributing to the economy. Though of course there are exceptions, as there is for everything.