this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
423 points (96.9% liked)
Videos
17677 readers
253 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not any tangible difference in this scenario. Both use vision only. And both use the same computers.
But do they use a different software? Maybe FSD is more advanced than autopilot and could have reacted better?
Just playing devil's advocate here.
The software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.
Yes, completely different software, but both are limited by machine vision.
Human drivers use vision only
Fortunately humans have much better hardware and software to accompany that vision.
FSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job.
And still we cause so many deaths because we are tired, distracted or emotional when driving.
But...it's not.
Based on? Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos?
It's not there yet but I don't see how it can't work with vision only. It just has to be safer than human drivers.
The fact that both systems are vision only, as I said previously.
Even better, I used it myself. For 3 months. It's awful.
Human drivers generally use sound as well.