1941
submitted 1 year ago by DeaDSouL@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Happy birthday 🎊🎉 GNU/Linux.

Today GNU/Linux is 32 years old.

It was thankfully released to the public on August 25th, 1991 by Linus Torvalds when he was only 21 years old student.

What a lovely journey 🤍

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 393 points 1 year ago

won't be big and professional like gnu

that didn't age well

[-] Mereo@lemmy.ca 240 points 1 year ago

And this:

and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks

[-] skadden@ctrlaltelite.xyz 89 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the absolute humility though

[-] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

Sure it aged well. WAY WAY BIGGER than gnu.

[-] wgs@lemmy.sdf.org 56 points 1 year ago

Weight your words my friend! GNU's a behemoth !

GCC alone is almost as big as Linux. Add core/binutils, the Hurd, ... And you easily outclass the kernel itself !

~ $ du -sh linux-6.4.12/ gcc-13.2.0/                    1.5G    linux-6.4.12/                                   1.1G    gcc-13.2.0/

Oh, and Emacs.

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 year ago

Speaking as someone that doesn't understand computers very well: is Hurd usable as a kernel nowadays?

[-] kionite231@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Yes if you cherry pick the hardware :)

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

What is actually the point of using hurd other than being able to say you use Hurd though?

[-] Dunstabzugshaubitze@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Maybe it hurds in a good way.

Nah, it's a kernel it does kernel stuff and does not offer anything a normal user notices compared to other kernels.

It might be interesting for people who work on kernels just to see different ways on how to solve common problems.

[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

afaik microkernels have a security advantage since kernel modules do not share the same address space as the main kernel or other modules

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Possibly licensing reasons. Linux is GPLv2 only, Hurd seems to be GPLv2 or later, there could be reasons you may want to use something under the GPLv3.

[-] jsnc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Hurd is not a monolithic kernel, so it's an interesting technical endeavor. It's also a GNU package which means it's guaranteed to stay libre.

Hurd is also a smaller project relative to linux without the many eyes of the Linux board members.

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 19 points 1 year ago

That's debatable, since what people generally call "Linux" is more GNU than Linux anyway. "Linux" as the Linux fandom considers is it big and professional like GNU, because it is GNU (among other things).

[-] xill47@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

But what about Linux distributions compiled without GNU tools? Most popular Linux distribution's kernel currently is compiled with Clang, not GCC, and as far as I am aware does not include anything from GNU. Of course Linux is historically influenced by GNU, but in current day and age they are orthogonal

[-] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't change the larger point that GNU is way bigger than Linux, though. There are a tonne of things that are larger than Linux, and GNU is one of them.

[-] xill47@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is an entirely different argument which I did not contest and the comment I have answered to did not make

EDIT: Although, it depends on what we define as "bigger". Binary size is certainly bigger, but user adoption is abysmal comparatively.

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 1 points 1 year ago

but user adoption is abysmal comparatively

I guess this is a matter of perspective. What I was saying in my previous comment is that what people commonly refer to as "Linux" (as in "Linux distributions") is not just Linux (which is just a kernel) but also includes a bunch of other stuff, including GNU (that is what GNU/Linux refers to). If you're talking about the actual thing called Linux, you'd be right, because most GNU systems are GNU/Linux systems, whereas arguably most Linux systems are not GNU systems; Alpine and Android are non-GNU Linux systems.

However, if like many in the Linux fandom you discount Android, then most Linux systems are GNU systems and vice-versa.

[-] xill47@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why would I discount the most popular applications of the kernel? That is almost the whole userbase

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't either, but you see the sentiment especially among the !linuxphones@lemmy.ml crowd. The fact that Android is Linux is significant because it does in fact allow you to run so-called "Linux apps" (either under Termux or under a dedicated chroot set up by something like UserLAnd) and that is something to be lauded. Android has problems but not being "real Linux" is not among them.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Allow me to interject for a moment...

[-] jsnc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I mean the GPL allowed linux to become a commercial entity. And the whole "professional" outlook is because theres a ton of companies who contribute either funds or development to the project.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
1941 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

47996 readers
1063 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS