this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
877 points (97.7% liked)

politics

20592 readers
4059 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 72 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Tim Walz unleashed would have won this.

He was hamstrug by Harris. He’s likely the dem’s best choice for 2028.

So of course they’ll run Newsome or Shapiro or Hillary Clinton again because they’re a bunch of idiots.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Running Hillary again

The fact that this is somewhat believable is so stupid

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

The Democratic Party is finished, just like the GOP.

[–] isaaclw@lemmy.world 31 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

And Harris was hamstrung by Biden.

She could have been better.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

She is a cop. She dropped out in 15th place in the 2020 primary before she was embarrassed in her home state of California. They should have never ran her and that's why they didn't do a primary.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Prosecutors are not cops.

I'm curious how you picture a society functioning without prosecutors. Please enlighten me.

Shit like this is why people don't take the "defund the police" movement seriously.

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Hey check out this hotshot over here with a long term memory! No, didn’t you hear she ran a perfect campaign they just couldn’t get enough celebrity endorsements…

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Some of us have a long enough memory to know that ozma's whole schtick has been shitting exclusively on Democrats for like the last year. He's not the guy you should look to for an unbiased opinion.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago) (1 children)

They did do a primary and Biden/Harris won. They had opposition even if you were unaware of it.

Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

It’s depressing how uninformed so many people are here of basic objective facts that are easily researched.

[–] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure how to respond to a lie that bold.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 46 minutes ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

No one is lying here. You seem to forget Dean Phillips ran against Biden. There was a primary.

Why are some on this site so aggressive while being so poorly informed?

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 8 hours ago

Or she could have not played this game, that she willfully engaged in. Harris is the epitome of a career politician that rose through the ranks by doing what the party elites wanted her to do.

Once she was announced candidate, she had all the options to go for her own platform and grow a spine, if she has one. Also that is a quality that is crucial in a president, who wants to lead the supposedly most powerful country on earth.

And this shows, what the DNC wants. They dont want a strong leader. They want a puppet they can control. This is also why they were more than happy to have Biden go for another 4 years, not despite, but because of his declining mental state making him a great puppet.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Pretty much any reasonable person unleashed by the Democratic party would have won.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. I remember a time when the Beltway insiders were acting like Amy Klobuchar was a rising star or some such, LOL.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Ah, Klobuchar. She is the prize senator from the DFL-- their only Sr Senator. She more or less runs it. The same Klobachar who threw out every single police misconduct case given to her when she was a county prosecutor, including the murder of George Floyd by officer Derek Chauvin. She just let him walk because he was a cop.