this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
532 points (98.9% liked)

politics

20421 readers
3207 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former federal prosecutor Sara Levine, fired by Trump, warned on 60 Minutes that the Justice Department is "under attack."

Levine, who prosecuted January 6 rioters, said she was fired for upholding the law.

Legal expert Peter Keisler criticized Trump's pardons of Capitol rioters, arguing they signal that crimes committed in support of Trump's agenda may go unpunished.

These actions undermine the rule of law and discouraging accountability for political violence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 13 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

This is what pisses me off about all the people who kept talking about how the Democrats were failing to get voters engaged in 2024.

If the Dems weren't doing the job, what was keeping you from stepping up?

Its like there was a fire going on and people were complaining the firemen weren't doing enough instead of jumping in and helping.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

Why should we fight for democrats when they don't fight for us?

The Democrats were never going to meet this moment.

[–] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a politician. I developed an entirely different set of skills. Throwing away my career at the potential of reskilling is absurd.

And Dems weren't doing their job. I'm tired of people pretending like that's acceptable. I canvass. I get people ready to vote. I do my part.

I can't even tell you the last time a Dem policy benefitted me directly. What I have in common with them really just boils down to them being the only opposition right now. I pushed Harris like we had to and I'll never forgive them for running such an unlovable candidate. They knew what they were doing. The second there's another serious option I'm gone. Dems complete lack of opposition makes them complicit in everything that's happening.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

AOC and Omar have entered the chat.

If you don't like the Dems that are in power now, you can primary them. If we get another election.

[–] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago

We haven't had a real primary in a long time.

AOC is a joke. I will actually not support that in any way. Dems are just as capable for what's happening. They're actively complicit.

[–] CMonster@discuss.online 3 points 15 hours ago (9 children)

How long until the dems have effective leadership putting people like AOC and Omar in the spotlight and building around them rather than keeping them on the fringes?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 22 hours ago (22 children)

Probably the part where I didn't receive over a billion dollars in donations to actually get media attention. A lot of people have been campaigning to get people to ditch the Democrats because they're controlled corporate stooges for the last few decades, I think you were shouting at them for supporting third parties at the time.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 7 points 22 hours ago (15 children)

And they should have been shouted at. The current system does not allow for third party viability as disappointing as that is.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The Harris campaign spent a billion and a half dollars on "getting voters engaged" and she still lost anyway. All the phone-banking and door-knocking in the world can't overcome the fundamental problem of refusing to adopt policies the people actually want!

So please, explain to me exactly what the fuck kind of "stepping up" you expect randos from the Internet, who had no ability to affect the campaign's platform, to actually fucking do?!

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Idk, maybe voting against the dude who straight up said he would be a dictator and you'd never vote again?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My analogy is that it was like someone threw a molotov cocktail through your window, but you let the house burn down because the window didn't stop the bottle.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

That'll teach that window.