this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
828 points (98.7% liked)

World News

41177 readers
3659 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump is pushing for softer language on Russia’s war in Ukraine, straining G7 unity.

Officials say the U.S. is blocking references to "Russian aggression" and prefers calling it the "Ukraine conflict."

This shift follows Trump's peace talks with Putin that excluded Ukraine's President Zelensky, whom Trump later called a "dictator."

The change in rhetoric contrasts with Biden-era support for Ukraine and threatens a unified G7 stance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Non voters aren’t worth going after.

The liberals will still keep voting so the DNC should ignore the left that have already abandoned them and go after the moderate right instead.

At least they consistently vote.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Like what they did in this election? How did that work out for them?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The liberal candidate barely lost while the progressive candidate didn’t even get a million votes.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What progressive candidate? I didn't know the Dems even considered a progressive candidate?

Oh, did you mean Jill Stein? So you consider her a progressive candidate now? What happened to all the Dems calling her a Russian asset?

Funny how people like you count her as a progressive candidate when you want to attack progressives, but dismiss her completely whenever people are talking about alternatives to Kamala.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Would you rather talk about Rachele Fruit from the Socialist Workers Party’s total of 4,225 votes?

She only needed 77,298,355 more votes to beat Trump!

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Then, would you rather talk about first past the post and how even with that help, the Democrats can't even beat an idiot like Trump? Why would you think that there are that many people who would vote for a third party that will never win anything vs the DNC if they had been bothered to listen to their support base? The Democrats only have themselves to blame for losing the election.

Again the DNC barely lost.

They beat Trump in 2020.