this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
287 points (95.3% liked)

Today I Learned

19099 readers
616 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a star and captures a large percentage of its power output. The concept is a thought experiment that attempts to imagine how a spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet's resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star's energy emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest far more energy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don’t remember the math, but you lose return on investment after a certain percentage of coverage.

Dyson Grids are the future!!! 😜

[–] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The other "benefit" to the sphere is blacking out a star. Other life, should it exist, is less likely to find the structure. ITT people destroying my dreams of a big shelly boi

[–] Bimfred@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would think it'd make it more likely that you're discovered when you turn your star into a black ball with a gigantic IR signature where a star should be. Any civilization with a cursory understanding of gravity and stellar spectra would turn every telescope they have on you.

[–] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What does IR red shift into over cosmic distances? But it would be just as, if not less, noticeable as a star suddenly dimming to [100%-optimal capture rate]

[–] Bimfred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Deeper IR, microwave and radio. Within a galaxy, redshift can be ignored. In another galaxy, the issue is moot, you don't need to worry about them and they don't need to worry about you.

Our current scopes can pick up brown dwarfs with a surface temperature below freezing. An object the diameter of a planetary orbit, with the gravitational effect of a main sequence star and giving off just black body radiation is gonna stick out like a neon "Interesting stuff here!" sign the moment someone does a long wavelength survey of your general region.

Even if you build a swarm instead of a solid shell, you're still going to shift the star's apparent spectrum towards IR, from the swarm radiating waste heat. A star whose mass, diameter and emission spectrum don't match up with the math is inviting investigation, regardless of how you try to mask what you've been doing.

The gravity from the star will also still be there regardless of how much of its EM signature is visible outside of the sphere.

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Ouh! Love me some "Dark Forest hypothesis" existential dread 😁

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't we cook in the end if you don't let out residual em?

[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's why you build a ringworld instead.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or DYson Bubbles, which would also "cover" enough "surface" to be viable without needing god knows how many planets' worth of material

[–] Holyginz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like the idea of a dyson swarm

[–] rowanthorpe@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

It would probably be configured using YAML and require health checks and quorum monitoring. I'm not sure I would want that job, especially on-call shifts. The consequences of downtime would be on a whole other level.