this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
1087 points (97.9% liked)

politics

20068 readers
5528 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration's authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anonymous_in_atl@ani.social 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If they're so pissed about it, the progressives should just pack up and form a new party or join the WFP

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah it's a clever lie that's perpetuated that says progressives have no where to go if they try to break from the Democrats. But secretly a more progressive platform would actually draw over a lot of disaffected libertarians and lite conservatives who only vote conservative because they've been convinced that they should only vote in opposition to Democrats instead of in favor of anything.

[–] rami@ani.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

from my experience with some libertarian 2a people I'd agree with this. I was surprised how indifferent (good) they were about minorities and trans people considering how they vote. honestly having a pro-drug, pro-gun* platform would win a huge chunk of them. and both of those would also be good for oppressed minorities (imo).

actually sitting here thinking about it do we have any figures on how much tax money gets pumped into prison systems that rely on drug enforcement to fill? not to mention the military industrial complex. cuz I know leftists like to riff on libertarians about "I don't understand how taxes work" but there's a lot of tax money going to things I don't agree with either.

*more like "sex positive" in the sense of education and safety and not shaming people who partake. not whatever the NRA is doing.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I mean, lots of "libertarians" are frothing at the mouth to defund our military but agree that the government should at least subsidize healthcare and education with some of those funds. The terms we have are loosey-goosey and most people are incoherent policy to policy. We've just been sorted into groups by a century of two-party propaganda.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've always said if Democrats just shut the fuck up about guns or God forbid even walk back a teensy but, they would have no problem winning. Plenty of single issue voters vote red because of successful propaganda. How the hell anybody thinks anyone is coming for their buns is beyond me, I always ask for an explanation of who and how their guns will be taken from them. Never a coherent answer.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How the hell anybody thinks anyone is coming for their buns is beyond me

My fiance said she's coming for my buns tonight

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Nice. Happy Valentine's Day!

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve always said if Democrats just shut the fuck up about guns or God forbid even walk back a teensy but, they would have no problem winning.

Gun nuts won't buy it. The base will. Moving to the right has hit a wall and anyone who suggests it just likes moving to the right.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Laying off the gun issue doesn't have to be a move to the right, plenty of leftists own guns. I'm just saying they should clearly state that they aren't coming for anyone's guns

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Laying off the gun issue doesn’t have to be a move to the right

But it will be.

I’m just saying they should clearly state that they aren’t coming for anyone’s guns

You expect gun nuts to buy that?

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you have to jump right to the extreme? If you're looking for useful discourse, immediately shutting down what you seem to agree would be a good idea isn't helpful. I know plenty of gun nuts that would absolutely drop the hate of the Republicans if they knew their hobby was secured. It's easy to do simply because NOBODY IS ACTUALLY GOING TO COME FOR ANYBODY'S GUNS. Who's going to do it, cops? The guys that love guns? The military? It's just a lack of critical thinking and a little bit of reassurance might go a long way.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Why do you have to jump right to the extreme? If you’re looking for useful discourse, immediately shutting down what you seem to agree would be a good idea isn’t helpful. I know plenty of gun nuts that would absolutely drop the hate of the Republicans if they knew their hobby was secured.

I live in Texas. I've seen Democrats run on "Of course we're not gonna take your guns!" And I've seen the response from gun nuts. They. Don't. Buy. It. Republicans shriek "gun grabber!" even louder because it sticks even when it's not true.

This is just moving to the right for the sake of moving to the right. It will gain nothing, and it will lose people for whom gun control is an actual issue.

[–] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not a lie when one party is fascist. Trying to split just ensures Nazi rule like IT JUST FICKING DID

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

There is only one party and its fascist. They're not the same because they're just as bad. They're the same because they're on the same team.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats suck the fattest corporate dick, lovingly, and laugh at the poor fighting amongst themselves, but it's not good to dilute such a serious label as fascist with something you don't like.

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing is 'diluted' about that term. Being complicit in genocide, extreme violence and prosecution simply for protesting it. Putting kids in cages, imperialism, regime change, warmongering, and plenty more. They are fascist, they're just too full of themselves to admit it. It's not good to negate these serious facts just because you don't like it.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your final little retort there mocking me is the most childish thing I've read on the internet in a little bit. You can compare a mountain to a molehill if you like but I think we have bigger problems to worry about.

What solution do you propose to not working with the Democrats right now? Splitting the party and forming a progressive party hoping for scraps from the right that just want guns AND weed and don't care about trans folks? What's your plan besides being angry at Corporate Democrats? Have you donated to any of our more progressive Representatives?

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody needs to split anything or work with them. 3rd parties already exist, even if they get scammed and sabotaged by your beloved party. "donated to any of our more progressive Representatives" LOL let me know who these 'progressives' are. BTW I'm European, not from your uniparty pseudo democracy and therefore can think outside the box. Your county's politics are ridiculous and embarrassing. I'm really happy you got Trump. Him destroying your country is the best thing that could happen for the world.

[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

haven't you heard?

everyone and everything that isn't the democrats is russian psy ops...

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you want the Democrats to fight more effectively against Trump, by running on a better platform and listening to the active voter base, so the country is safe for at least 4 more years and maybe arrest Trump, you are actually:

  • A tankie
  • A russian bot
  • A brainwashed Fox News watcher
  • A china spy who was brainwashed by TikTok
  • A republican who pretends to be a democrat
  • A useful idiot for Republicans
  • Whatever MSNBC said this week was the thing to watch out for

It's mentally draining that I am on the side of the Democrats winning, because I know I would have prefered Harris to Trump every single day. Despite her record of trans rights and gaza, because she could have been pushed forward by learning from mistakes and not having her brains be mush like Trump and Biden.

And because I wanted her to win by publicly expressing the things documented in her campaign's website? I'm somehow wanting Trump to win despite being a disabled queer.

I just don't get how so many liberals will see me go "Harris should advocate for this thing that would be good, she said she wants it in the past" and then read that as "I hate her because she's a Democrat woman, I also love to eat shit of out Trump's asshole and claim it's owning the libs."

Never once have I ever praised Trump unironically, I can could count on two fingers things I am neutral towards, (Backing out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and getting rid of the Penny) and that's it, everything else he has made my life worse on the Federal level, and helped some of my friends die from COVID.

I just got to wonder if the people who constantly think this are just angry that Trump got a loyal unquestioning fanbase, and want a piece of the media-manipulated voter base for themselves.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 1 day ago

I just got to wonder if the people who constantly think this are just angry that Trump got a loyal unquestioning fanbase, and want a piece of the media-manipulated voter base for themselves

Yes, because they think that's how he won since they ignore everything Trump and downtrodden people say on the premise that they are dumb and valid to be ignored.

There isn't a recognition of changing to meet people suffering to show empathy but a thought that if they just had enough power first they could fix whatever is really wrong cause it must be something other than what people are complaining about.

They want the power without purpose which isn't a winning strategy compared to explaining what you intend to do with power for people who feel powerless.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's why they've earned the name Blue MAGA. They're just as hateful, just as interested in Yes Men and making sure people submit to their authority unquestioningly. They want Fascism-Lite, they just want it to be "their guy" in charge.

It blows my mind that people criticize the GOP for being so tribalistic, not realizing a majority of the DNC is exactly the same.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

And then they get mad when we call them that, and say we actually hate America like MAGA dipshits.

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

No no, it's the Chinese this week. +10 sosjal credits Xi bucks for your comment commmie!

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

everyone and everything that isn't the democrats is russian psy ops...

Everyone and everything to the left of Netanyahu's wing of the Democratic Party.

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what progressives would want to be in a disgusting right wing party?

[–] anonymous_in_atl@ani.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Working Families Party isn't right wing.

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

Don't know much about them but from things like this: https://medium.com/@bradlander/vote-for-harris-walz-on-the-working-families-party-line-2cad53ac4643 Looks like controled opposition to steal votes from real left parties. Much like AOC and other fake 'progressives'. When they still endorse the genocider and billionaires parties they can go to hell. There are genuine 3rd parties with awesome socialist cplatforms not this garbage.