this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
355 points (99.7% liked)
Steam Deck
15402 readers
35 users here now
A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.
Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.
As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title
The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.
Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.
These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.
Rules:
- Follow the rules of Sopuli
- Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
- No piracy, there are other communities for that.
- Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
- This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
- Have fun.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah I don't get it either. Just make 80% the new 100%, and if someone wants to get the most capacity as a "power user" (no pun intended), they can manually switch to a capacity of 120% at the warning that this will decrease battery life time.
This way, it's opt-out instead of opt-in.
120% of 80 is 96. You'd have to let them charge to 125% to get to 100
Yeah, I was just trying to keep it simple for the non math folks.
That doesn't really work with manufacturers trying to win customers on battery life, as well as hoping that customers will buy a new device rather sooner than later.
~~True, we can't have nice things under capitalism.~~
Actually, scratch that. If every single manufacturer would do the same, there would be no change for consumers, except better battery health. And the option to reduce health for more capacity.
Mmm i wouldn't go that far on most devices, most of the time that would result in unsatisfying runtime.
however for devices where they can easily run days on a charge, yeah it makes sense. My xiaomi smartwatch gets 6 fucking days on 70% charge with quite a lot of power-drawing features enabled, so there's really no reason to ever charge it above 80%.
But on my phone i very much need to be able to charge it to 100% before travelling, it only gets like 16h with the screen off on a full charge.
Your phone only last 16 hours and that's with the screen off? I think you need to check your phone, because that's not normal. Your phone should be able to last a full day or two.
Yeah, so at that point you opt-in to the "overcharge" (just to make it look scary!) method of charging 100%