this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
438 points (96.8% liked)

News

35749 readers
1986 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

President Biden warns of 'oligarchy' as he bids farewell to five decades in ~~politics~~ service to the oligarch-beholden establishment

Fixed it for them.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we allowed Biden and the DNC to write the tax plans it would have made billionaires eat shit. Instead the country reelected the guys who made the last awful tax plan just as it expires next year.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He did try many times to get rid of student loans, only for Trump’s judicial picks to say it’s illegal to forgive loans of poor people

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fun fact: if he hadn't deliberately means tested student loan forgiveness to death, the GOP lawyers wouldn't have been able to argue discrimination and he knew that.

He wanted the credit for trying, but his owner donors didn't want his "attempt" to actually succeed.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and he knew that.

Or

He's a fucking liberal that believes means-testing actually works.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Except for all the times that it doesn't. This is one of those times.

People who are rich enough to not need student loan forgiveness don't have student loans in the first place. Either they come from a rich family that paid for their college or they did so themselves after becoming rich.

With that in mind, means testing student loan forgiveness to death was a hell of a lot of downside including the argument that the fascists used to kill it, in exchange for absolutely no upside.

Regardless of his personal beliefs, half a century worth of experience should be WAY more than necessary to find out how things work regardless of how you think they SHOULD work.

He either knew that means testing would doom it to failure and did it anyway, means tested it BECAUSE he knew it would cause it to fail, or he was WAY too incompetent and naive for someone who'd been in the game for longer than most people have been ALIVE.

Either way, he fucked it up.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except for all the times that it doesn’t. This is one of those times.

Whether it actually works has nothing to do with whether he believes it works.

Whether or not he believes in something working after FIFTY YEARS of trying and mostly failing it says a lot about how stubborn and/or bad at his job he is.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we allowed Biden and the DNC to write the tax plans

We did. As usual, they didn't do what they and people like yourself who's drunk the kool-aid keep pretending they're going to do.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We literally didn't, lol, the Trump era tax plans expire next year.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He was president and the Dems had congressional majorities for some of the time. If they really wanted to significantly overhaul the tax code, they could have.

They want to PRETEND that they're on the side of the people against the billionaires to fool the gullible into thinking that they're the good guys rather than the least bad ones, but they know who pays them and it ain't you..

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The senate was a 50:50 deadlock unable to pass anything without Republicans agreeing or they faced filibuster, and even then they needed all 48/47 DNC and independents to vote in unison if none of the Republicans crossed the isle, then utilize VP tiebreaker.

The house was a DNC majority for only his first two years.

And as I explained to you multiple times, the tax plan did not expire under Biden's presidency.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“They”? I think you mean Sinema and “Mansion”.

I mean them, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries, and the rest of the DNC leadership.