this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
196 points (76.8% liked)

memes

11201 readers
3302 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh my god, can you people shut up with this already.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The senate, and SCOTUS are verrrry democratic.

Not having primaries for either of the two available parties is very democratic.

The electoral college is the most democratic way to make sure the minority voice maintains a dictatorship.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If he meant "this system isn't democratic enough", hard agree. It sounded like the "the founders wanted a republic and we should stop trying to be a democracy" you hear from MAGAs.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the founders wanted an oligarchy, and we have an oligarchy...

The first step to fixing the problem, is admitting we have a problem: The US was never intended to be a democracy for anyone except oligarchs, and it's still not a democracy for anyone but oligarchs.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

On paper, it was a rejection of monarchism, so a step away from centralized control - but, in the same sort of way as the Magna Carta, where they didn't make the leap all the way to popular democracy, and instead sought to partially democratize power only among the ruling class. More democratic features have been added since then (suffrage, equal protection clause, etc.), though not nearly enough. IMO we do need to completely throw the system out and start over, only carrying over things for the sake of streamlining/continuity.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When a person says the US is a republic, not a democracy, I take it as them defining "democracy" as a "pure democracy" only, despite the fact that there are other kinds, such as republics. Kinda like saying "that's not a dog, it's a Labrador."

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dx1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He wrote "it's not a democracy, it's a republic" originally.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was explaining my fish preferences.

I tried to hold on to the red snapper but I took what was in the box.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Do you not love fish?

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why not? It’s fun. Plus I hate it when the herring bones get stuck in my teeth.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

No I didn’t.