this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
196 points (76.8% liked)

memes

11186 readers
4911 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Those are valid criticisms, but can equally be applied to all of the rest of our main social media platforms.

I’m not seeing a big difference here between TikTok and YouTube except that one is not able to be influenced or backdoored by the US government and the other is.

In essence the optics here look an awful lot like the US simply doesn’t like other nations mining their citizens data that they want for themselves, and having foreign control of the type of news being fed by their algorithm.

Just remember that before Snowden dropped a dime on the NSA, similar suspicions sounded pretty wacky too

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In essence the optics here look an awful lot like the US simply doesn’t like other nations mining their citizens data that they want for themselves, and having foreign control of the type of news being fed by their algorithm.

Well duh? Why do you think China blocks a lot of the US social media?

[–] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

But they haven't blocked all social media, just prevented their citizens from interacting with other people

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

But… US companies are allowed to sell the data of citizens to other countries? Do they want some taxes before they give arbitrary your info that is literally unusable for anything aside from customizing ads

This argument bleeds from so many wounds! With how much could have Cuckerberg bribe both parties?

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It'd be much more surprising to see the Awmerican government manipulating the algorithms etc to push propoganda narratives whereas it's a pretty safe assumption that's the case on tiktok.

Edit: Sorry, do downvoters think the American government is adjusting social media algorithms? Or do folks not believe China would do so?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bruh, facebook just changed their terms of service to be pro US right wing propaganda...

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

You don't get the difference between changing the algorithms vs allowing different content?

And also didn't notice the vocal feedback about the change vs say hearing nothing about any algorithm changes?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know what they say about assuming...

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

To be clear, you imagine the Chinese government, which has a large group dedicated to censoring all internet communication/social media behind the Great Firewall, has decided that it would be rude to tweak algorithms to push similar narratives to what the Party would push?

Or what, China's very public efforts to shape global narratives only goes as far as public and global policy but they respect the sanctity of your social media feed?