557
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 52 points 1 year ago

A haiku about this comment section:

Healthy mind? Minor? We don't rehabilitate In the USA

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Look I'm all for rehabilitation, but she's 19 currently, which places her at 16-17 for the murder, without doing more research. By all means, she should receive psychiatric care and rehabilitation should be attempted, but we shouldn't have our hopes up. And while that's going on, she must be kept imprisoned -- mercy should not come at the expense of the innocence. Someone who makes a threat and then consciously speeds up to kill someone with a car is dangerous to society.

Something else I've come to learn is that unfortunately, punishment is necessary. Someone who's prone to angry outbursts of racism and hate needs to understand that it's absolutely unacceptable and they need to change. If you keep giving them a slap on the wrist each time, they won't take it seriously, as compassionate as you are and as much as you try to convince them to change their ways.

[-] Okkai@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

You're correct. She was 17 when this occurred

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

This woman will be like 70 paying for the sins of a crazy 17 year old she doesn't know or understand. Reminds me of Shawshank Redemption. I can feel bad for the victims while also empathizing with the life of the perp being lost and wasted as well

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Though I mostly agree with your I do wonder what you'd think if this wasn't a cute sexy teenager but a fat 25 year old black girl. Or worse, an ugly black guy.

I'm reading these comments and find weirdly a lot of "aahhhwww poor her" messages and I can't escape the feeling it's because she's young and pretty

[-] xxkickassjackxx@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately she made a decision that KILLED SOMEONE with the intent of KILLING SOMEONE.

Her victims will never get to be 70. Let her rot.

And you’re acting like that 70 year old is innocent. That 70 year old intentionally murdered someone because she was upset. Yeah it was 53 years ago but that’s the same person. 53 years ago that 70 year old deprived another human being of the rest of their life because she got upset. I don’t think you’d have the same sympathy for other criminals just because their crime was decades ago.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think people might be getting too hung up on the car and thinking it makes this less of a big deal. It's the opposite though imo -- you shoot a loaded gun, it's a split second. You hit someone with a car, you've had plenty of time to think things through. You don't tap the accelerator once and then they're dead. You have to commit to the decision, and actively choose to not hit the brakes or swerve away or throw on the emergency brake.

I have no pity. She knew what she was doing, she chose to do it, and she thought about it beforehand.

[-] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you’re the same person at 70 than you were at 17, that’s more of a you problem than anything. Like seriously, that’s not good.

[-] xxkickassjackxx@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

I’m not claiming the person wouldn’t have any growth or change. The growth or change doesn’t negate that this girl committed premeditated murder.

[-] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nobody argued that it does. They’re arguing that a 70 year old shouldn’t be held responsible for actions they took over 5 decades in the past - from when they were a person so far removed from who they are now that they’re effectively a different person.

No, they’re not literally a different person. Nobody’s actually arguing that lol.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It probably would have made a difference if the victims families could see it this way. It’s not like she ran him over. She crashed the car she was in also. Clearly an unsound mind at work.

Yet they begged for the harshest possible sentence. It won’t be enough for them. But the rest of us get to pay for her incarceration for the rest of her natural life.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I went through some pretty turbulent relationship shit when I was that young. One time my girlfriend was so mad at me she opened the car door while we were traveling at freeway speed. She didn’t jump, but still… I feel like I brushed up against this level of crazy even in just the course of my rather average teenage years.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hoh boy you definitely did

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The u.s system is about revenge and punishment

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I was wondering if I was the only one thinking “mentally unfit and not even a legal adult.”

People are all on fire about the fact that she threatened it beforehand therefore it’s open and shut murder. But crazy people are capable of making threats.

[-] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Last i checked rehab was like a monster truck derby.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
557 points (95.9% liked)

News

23627 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS