Communism had administrators, planners, managers, etc so it keeps some form of authority and hierarchy, to be clear, it's just that these are a necessity for large-scale production and aren't classes.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

so there is no one "at the top" "exploiting people at the bottom"

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, technically there is a top and a bottom, like an upper level administrator and a lower level worker, but this is not a relationship of exploitation just like it isn't your manager that exploits you under Capitalism, but the Business Owner(s).

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago

under communism, there is no exploitation