Trying to claim the term “Web3” is a futile battle. It is already widely understood to mean crypto and blockchain. If I see a job posting that says the company is built on Web3, I know immediately that the job is built on scams and grifts without having to ask further questions. Web3 as a term is ruined already.

For this to work it must be a different term than Web3. Maybe “Web 3.0” is different enough?

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 31 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Time for Web4

[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Just do what USB does and call it "Web 3 v2"

[–] vidumec@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Web 3 v2 final (1)

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 8 points 2 years ago

Note that not all Web 3 v2 final (1) features are required to be labeled Web 3 v2 final (1). Please consult vendor documentation to determine which features are supported on their device.

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Web 3 v2 final (1)++ Remastered Advanced with Knuckles Pro Edition

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 2 points 2 years ago

Is it the Japanese Director's Cut?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (57 replies)