this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
1062 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

6015 readers
2223 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What does it cost to do this?

Maybe it should just be a thing.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The sad thing is when you can get actual numbers on what the costs of things are to the state and federal governments to keep things the way they currently are it's really bonkers that policy is setup the way it's setup.

The United States spends on average about $72,500 per year per incarcerated individual, which given the number of people who are in prison due to circumstances of poverty is a lot more than it would cost to simply have the funds available to individuals to intervene before they make the choices that land them in prison. For context the median individual income in the US is $37,585

Medicaid has an median cost per enrollee of $9,108 which is about the same unsubsidized cost of private health insurance, except Medicaid has no deductible, no copays (I believe some medications do have pretty low copays but that's all that I've seen during periods where we did qualify or for my special needs child who's on a special Medicare plan for children with disabilities) and generally means you simply receive the care you need without paying a dime to the medical facility. In other words, Americans could feasibly collectively pay the government exactly what they already pay private insurance companies in premiums and receive better coverage for less cost than under the current system.

The average cost per homeless person (this is primarily a cost in extra social services to support their existence) is $35,500 per year in the US. The average annual cost of rent in US is $20,400. The US could simply pay to rent every homeless person an average apartment in the country and save $15,000/year per person in social services, and that's before even considering more creative options such as public housing, or providing subsidies/incentives to house the housing insecure in lower cost regions of their respective states (which might well save small town America, given most small towns are consistently shrinking in population)

The unavoidable conclusion is that American politicians simply choose to burn unthinkable billions of dollars every year to perpetuate human suffering

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Almost nothing relative to the us budget.

[–] Antiproton@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

An aircraft carrier costs almost nothing compared to the US budget. That's not a useful metric.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Less than it would cost for you to sell your body for sex? More than the cost of a single elephant? Less than 500 lbs of tulips during the crypto boom accounting for inflation.

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Much less than an aircraft carrier how about that

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

And this wasn't the USA government. It was a city or Make-A-Wish. (I just have the tweet to work from.)